While intrepidly exploring rec.food.drink.tea, Space Cowboy rolled
initiative and posted the following:

> That's the reason killfiles are useless.

Surprisingly, I think we can both agree that the effectiveness of a
killfile rests on the software used, the knowledge of the user, and
the thoroughness of a scoring file.

> You can read me now or read me later.

Not really. If I wanted to block out all of your posts or any
responses, I can set my newsreader to do so.

> When Dejavu archived Usenet the percentage of
> replies to my posts were 99%. At one point in time I was in the
> top 100 with number of posts and replies.

Which actually proves nothing about the quality or content of your
posts.

> Usually when people
> killfile me they usually make it a public lynching. Why did you
> wait two years?

The statement preceeding the question is unprovable, unless you can
specify exactly how many people have you killfiled and how many of
those people announced said "plonking".

> I don't hide behind bogus email accounts like
> many embarrassed New Yorkers who stiff the doorman at Christmas.

Which is an obvious and petty ad hominem attack, and proves nothing.

--
Derek

Road Kill Cafe - We make it your way, right away.
Straight from your grill to ours.