Goo - ****wit David Harrison, a cracker idiot - lied:

> On Mon, 11 Jun 2007 16:47:33 GMT, Rudy Canoza pointed out:
>
>>>> animals do not "benefit" by coming into existence.
>>>
>>> So you claim, but as yet you still can't explain why
>>> you think so.
>>
>> I have shown that it is so, ****wit. Stop lying.
>
> Yet you can't do it now,

I've done it many times, Goo. A benefit is something that improves an
entity's welfare, and coming into existence does not improve the welfare
of the entity that comes into existence.

It's very basic stuff, Goo.


>> YOU want non-existent livestock to come into
>> existence, and you pretend it's for their benefit, when
>> it clearly is only for yours.
>
> I can consider both

You do not "consider" either the lives *or* the welfare of livestock
animals, Goo - all you consider is the products. This is amply
demonstrated by your quotes.


--
Any more lip out of you and I'll haul off and let you have it...if you
know what's good for you, you won't monkey around with Fred C. Dobbs