The myth of food production "efficiency" in the "ar" debate
Goo - ****wit David Harrison, a cracker idiot - lied:
> On Thu, 07 Jun 2007 15:01:10 GMT, Rudy > wrote:
>
>>
>> Be all that as it may, ****wit, it has no bearing on
>> the fact that animals do not "benefit" by coming into
>> existence.
>
> So you claim, but as yet you still can't explain why
I've explained it.
>> Your absurd demand for "consideration" to
>> be given to their lives has been revealed for what it
>> is: an insistence that livestock animals "ought" to
>> exist
>
> Which particular "livestock animals" do you think you're
> trying to talk about there
The non-existent "future farm animals" that "aras" want to remain
non-existent, Goo. The ones you insist deserve "consideration", i.e.,
the ones you say everyone should want to exist.
--
Any more lip out of you and I'll haul off and let you have it...if you
know what's good for you, you won't monkey around with Fred C. Dobbs
|