The myth of food production "efficiency" in the "ar" debate
Goo - ****wit David Harrison, a cracker idiot - lied:
> On Sat, 02 Jun 2007 19:25:16 GMT, > wrote:
>
>> Goo - ****wit David Harrison, a cracker idiot - lied:
>>> On Thu, 31 May 2007 19:04:00 GMT, > wrote:
>>>
>>>> Goo - ****wit David Harrison, a cracker idiot - lied:
>>>>> On Thu, 31 May 2007 07:18:27 GMT, > wrote:
>>>> [..]
>>>>
>>>>>>> You don't know the difference between elegant and eloquent.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I do, but you don't, dummy. You had never heard the adjective elegant
>>>>>> used
>>>>>> to describe an argument before, now you're befuddled. Here's a clue, it
>>>>>> is
>>>>>> commonly used when referring to mathematical arguments that are very
>>>>>> succinct and pure in their application of logic, clear and irrefutable.
>>>>>
>>>>> Then Dean used the wrong term, that's all.
>>>>
>>>> Nonsense, Dean used the word, we have to assume it was what he meant to
>>>> sayunless he says otherwise.
>>>
>>> No we don't, especially since it doesn't even apply to
>>
>> Yes, you do.
>
> We can't.
You can't, because of your mental limitations. Others can.
--
Any more lip out of you and I'll haul off and let you have it...if you
know what's good for you, you won't monkey around with Fred C. Dobbs
|