"veganism" isn't what it purports to be
Rupert wrote:
> On Dec 29, 11:13 am, ex-PFC Wintergreen >
> wrote:
>> Rupert wrote:
>>> On Dec 29, 10:57 am, ex-PFC Wintergreen >
>>> wrote:
>>>> Rupert wrote:
>>>>> On Dec 29, 2:46 am, ex-PFC Wintergreen >
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> Rupert wrote:
>>>>>>> On Dec 27, 8:49 am, ex-PFC Wintergreen >
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>> Ha wrote:
>>>>>>>>> ex-PFC Wintergreen wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> All "vegans" start by believing a logical fallacy:
>>>>>>>>>> If I consume animal products, I cause animals to suffer and die.
>>>>>>>>>> I don't consume any animal products;
>>>>>>>>>> therefore, I don't cause any animals to suffer and die.
>>>>>>>>> All vegans?
>>>>>>>> Without exception. They all start with that, and many - probably most -
>>>>>>>> never move off it. Look at the myriad "vegan" web sites that extol
>>>>>>>> "veganism" as a means of living a "cruelty-free" or "death-free"
>>>>>>>> lifestyle. Those people, by necessary implication, believe in the
>>>>>>>> logical fallacy.
>>>>>>> It's probably fair to say that it is quite widespread
>>>>>> Universal, at the outset. Most never abandon it.
>>>>> See the discussion in my other post.
>>>> See my well established fact, above: All "vegans" begin by believing in
>>>> the logical fallacy, and most never abandon it.
>>> No, "well established fact" is not the phrase you were looking for
>> Indeed it is what I was looking for.
>
> Well, that's a shame
I don't think so.
|