"notbob" > wrote in message
...
> On 2009-09-26, l, not -l > wrote:
>>
>> On 26-Sep-2009, "Theron" > wrote:
>>
>>> America's test kitchen has on a very good looking, and hopefully tasting
>>> stovetop "barbecued pork" dish. Check out:
>>>
>>> http://www.americastestkitchen.com/c...eadedporkchops
>>>
>>> Ed
>>
>> Either the link is in error or we have vastly different ideas of what
>> constitutes barbecue. The link is to a recipe for "shake and bake" pork
>> chops. Even allowing for the wide misuse of the term barbecue, a baked,
>> or
>> even pan fried, pork chop isn't barbecue. Please provide an updated
>> link.
>
> Theron mis-quoted the link. It was for "crunchy pork chops" not bbq.
> Besides, ATK is so far away from anything resembling good cooking,
> it's no surprise they would try and improve upon shake n bake.
>
> nb
>
>
As below, Christopher Kimball has the "Indoor Barbecue Pork" recipe on his
site, but has not released it for free viewing as he's supposed. He's a very
greedy marketer.

Sorry for the mistake,

Ed


>