In article >,
"jmcquown" > wrote:

> "Omelet" > wrote in message
> news
> > In article >,
> > "jmcquown" > wrote:
> >
> >> "Hugh" > wrote in message
> >> ...
> >> >
> >> > "GW" > wrote in message
> >> > ...
> >> >> Subject says it all. Where did it go?
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> > Rec.food.recipes is a moderated newsgroup. The moderator retired. No
> >> > one
> >> > has emerged who wants to take that role. As a moderated NG messages are
> >> > subject to a moderator's approval. There isn't a moderator and hence,
> >> > there are no posted messages. This newsgroup is non moderated, and
> >> > anything goes, as we all know. The fraction of good solid posts about
> >> > cooking has become quite small, and overwhelmed by spams and flames. I
> >> > wish there is a way to balance the extremes of moderated and
> >> > non-moderated
> >> > groups into something that would work. Is there a way we can keep the
> >> > flaming foodies and dump the watch sellers?
> >> >
> >> > Hugh
> >> >
> >> >
> >> Killfile googlemail and gmail and you won't see the spammers.
> >>
> >> Jill
> >
> > If you killfile gmail, you will lose a lot of good posters too. Many of
> > us use gmail. :-(
> > --
> > Peace! Om
> >
>
> Ah, the blessings of Vista I get to pick and choose, sweetie. I see
> your posts. I don't see the ones I don't want to. Other "real" newsreaders
> allow you to write strings to block things. Blinky was very good at
> informing people about that but alas, we lost Blinky.
>
> Jill

I miss him. <sniffs>

Cheers Jill! (raising one for Blinky the Shark)
--
Peace! Om

Life isn't about waiting for the storm to pass.
It's about learning to dance in the rain.
-- Anon.