In article
>,
DaleW > wrote:

> On Dec 10, 2:11?pm, "Bi!!" > wrote:
> > On Dec 10, 12:44 pm, DaleW > wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > > On Dec 10, 10:53 am, "John T" > wrote:
> >
> > > > we'll use them as> Guinea pigs on this win
> >
> > > > will be interested in the 82 showing.
> >
> > > > And Thalabert often performs above it's pay grade, haven't you found?
> >
> > > > Yes Bill, but this was a serious step up.
> >
> > > > JT
> >
> > > Thanks for notes. I hope my lone bottle of '99 Thalabert shows as well
> > > as this! I agree that it was often an overachiever , I;ve still got an
> > > '85 ( I know that's pushing it)
> > > Your bottle of '83 La Chapelle showed better than one we had a couple
> > > years ago.
> > > I tend to find Jaboulet has more bottle variation than most, even in
> > > the flagship bottlings.
> >
> > I have a ton of La Chapelle from the late 80's through 2000 and the
> > vintages are textbook examples of vintage variation but I haven't
> > noticed a lot of bottle variation. ?I always bought case lots so that
> > might explain why.- Hide quoted text -
> >
> > - Show quoted text -
>
> I'd say the La Chapelle shows it less than the other wines, but I
> still have run across very very different showing from different
> bottles, even though both should have had good storage. That can be
> true of any wine,but I seem to have run across more with Jaboulet,
> even La Chapelle (actually the Thalabert seems more consistent to me).
> Of course, my calling it bottle variation might be a subconscious
> Jaboulet bias, as I strongly feel their larger negociant bottlings
> (Les Jalets, P45) are poster children for bottle variation (or to be
> more correct, batch variation, as I strongly suspect they are not
> consistently the same wine).

Vieux Telegraphe also seems to have a lot of bottle variation for me.