On Aug 14, 4:06*pm, Derek > wrote:
>
> > Still can't explain away the balloon full of air huh? Not surprised.
>
> Still can't explain how you get a chemical reaction result from a
> physical reaction, huh?

No. Neither can you.

>
> Doing what? Your work for you?
No lazy ass. I've done it. Get those eyes checked.


> > Bla bla bla do the test and put the trollisms aside until you do.
>
> Answer my original question and prove me wrong, and I'll do the test
> following your specifications.

When? 2012?

> > more bla
>
> Condescending toward my assertion doesn't make it wrong.

Instead of wasting your life away typing, go to Michaels for a
balloon.

> >> You may call me a troll, if you like. It still doesn't mean you know
> >> what you're writing about.
>
> > That's what you are.

Proof positive.

> What's the problem? Are you incapable of answering my original
> question? All else in this thread stems from your assertion that steam
> is air. Answer my question and prove me wrong.

I posted the (only) original question.

> But answer it directly. This isn't Athens and you're not Socrates.

Do your test and you'll answer it for yourself. And stop wasting time
here.