JethroUK© wrote:

> "Wilson Woods" > wrote in message
> k.net...
>
>>JethroUK© wrote:
>>
>>
>>>"Wilson Woods" > wrote in message
link.net...
>>>
>>>
>>>>JethroUK© wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>"Wilson Woods" > wrote in message
hlink.net...
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>the semi-literate JethroUK© scrawled:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>"Wilson Woods" > wrote in message
rthlink.net...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>JethroUK© wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>It is not important to any animal, a priori, that it
>>>>>>>>>>"gets to exist".
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>yes it is
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>No, it isn't. I've explained in plain English why it
>>>>>>>>cannot be. I suppose English is not your native tongue.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>yes it is
>>>>>>
>>>>>>It doesn't appear to be. I don't think you could
>>>>>>express coherent thoughts in any language.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>you mean you've 'read' somewhere that it isn't
>>>>
>>>>No, I am merely going by your severely impaired
>>>>articulation in English. It would appear that English
>>>>is not your native tongue. It doesn't merely appear,
>>>>it is a FACT that you are an uneducated twit who has no
>>>>business whatever trying to discuss philosophy. Your
>>>>opinions are ignornant and uninformed. No matter what
>>>>your native tongue, you cannot express coherent thoughts.
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>say you
>>
>>Correctly, and with much support.
>>
>
>
> i eat - therfor i breed cows - everyones is 'better' off for it

Not the cattle. This has been explained to you a few
dozen times in plain English. I don't know what your
problem is. Perhaps you were dropped onto your head a
few times as an infant.