Why is JethroUK so horribly afraid to answer simple and good questions?
"Wilson Woods" > wrote in message
nk.net...
> JethroUK© wrote:
>
> > "not a philosopher" > wrote in message
> > news:FvPpc.164748$f_5.142824@lakeread01...
> >
> >>"Wilson Woods" > wrote in message
> ink.net...
> >>: JethroUK, clearly a coward, keeps EVADING simple and
> >>: legitimate questions.
> >>:
> >>: Jethro wrote,
> >>:
> >>: "is it better to raise an animal to eat, or not to
> >>: raise it at all?"
> >>:
> >>: "i'll rephrase that - is it better to raise an
> >>: animal to consume (wider sense), or not to raise it
> >>: at all?"
> >>:
> >>: "i'll try again - is it more/less moral to raise an
> >>: animal to consume (wider sense), or not to raise it
> >>: at all?"
> >>
> >>It is better not to raise an animal at all rather than to
> >>raise it to slaughter and eat.
> >
> >
> > but if you are going to eat it anyway - it's better (for animalkind)
>
> No such thing.
Ok - it's better the animal world as a whole - is that easier for you to
grasp?
>
> >
> >
> >> First it damages the human spirit to eat other animals, IMO.
> >
> >
> > depends on the idividual - you cant speak for everyone
>
> You seem to think you can speak for all of
> "animalkind", you idiot.
>
facts dear boy, are evident! - the gene pool alone benefits from a larger
populous - how much evidence would you like?
|