"Wilson Woods" > wrote in message
ink.net...
> JethroUK© wrote:
>
> >>>> for whom or what might it be "better"/"more moral"
> >>>> if animals come into existence?
> >
> >
> > It would be better for:
> >
> > 1/ That particular animal
>
> NO. "That particular animal" didn't exist prior to
> existing, so coming into existence CANNOT "benefit" it.

it's not 'comming into existance' (as per a twinkle in it's mothers eye - as
per the article you are trying to regurgite, but totally MIS-read) - it
already exists!

typically - you see what you want to see - dont read into an article what
isn't there, just because it suits you

>
> > 2/ Animal Kind
>
> No such thing.

you need to get out more - of course there is


>
> > 3/ My sandwich
>
> No one cares.

i do - i need a balanced diet - i am an omnivore (which means i need meat),
and i have the teeth to prove it

>
> > 4/ World as a whole
>
> No.

Ceratinly Yes!

>
> Bad answers, as I expected, and as you knew you would
> provide.
>

what answers would you like - or more correctly - what answers would you
feel comfortable attacking - i'll provide them