View Single Post
  #7 (permalink)   Report Post  
 
Posts: n/a
Default Why is JethroUK so horribly afraid to answer simple and good questions?

On Sat, 15 May 2004 19:44:22 GMT, Wilson Woods > wrote:

wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 14 May 2004 20:43:24 GMT, Wilson Woods > wrote:
>>
>>
>>>JethroUK, clearly a coward, keeps EVADING simple and
>>>legitimate questions.
>>>
>>>Jethro wrote,
>>>
>>> "is it better to raise an animal to eat, or not to
>>> raise it at all?"
>>>
>>> "i'll rephrase that - is it better to raise an
>>> animal to consume (wider sense), or not to raise it
>>> at all?"
>>>
>>> "i'll try again - is it more/less moral to raise an
>>> animal to consume (wider sense), or not to raise it
>>> at all?"
>>>
>>>He has been asked REPEATEDLY and civilly:
>>>"better"/"more moral" for whom or what?

>>
>>
>> I've asked you "ARAs"

>
>No.
>
>> more than once for whom or what it would
>> be better not to raise animals to eat.

>
>They answer,


You agree with "them". You are one of them.

>"It is morally wrong, in an absolute sense
>- unjust, in other words - if humans kill animals


And exactly why is that?

>they
>don't need to kill, i.e. not in self defense." There's
>your answer.


You didn't answer the question. You simply changed
the subject. LOL! You are hilarious Gonad. In a post where
you are criticising someone for being afraid to answer
questions, you obviously are horribly afraid to answer the
very same question. Here you go, slink away from it again:

For whom or what it would be better not to raise animals
to eat?

>Of course, most of the time, you are addressing
>yourself to people who are NOT "aras".


Most of the time I'm addressing you and Dutch Gonad,
and you are both "ARAs". Swamp is about the only other
person claiming to be an "AR" opponent who appears to
care at all, and all of his arguments are "AR" arguments.

>Most of the
>time, you are addressing yourself to opponents of "ar"
>who disagree with your foolish "getting to experience
>life" nonsense.
>
>Anyway, you were asked for whom or what would it be a
>loss if "future farm animals" were "prevented" from
>living,


And I asked who would benefit if they are. Who would
Gonad? What would Gonad?