"Wilson Woods" > wrote in message
k.net...
> JethroUK, clearly a coward, keeps EVADING simple and
> legitimate questions.
>
> Jethro wrote,
>
> "is it better to raise an animal to eat, or not to
> raise it at all?"
>
> "i'll rephrase that - is it better to raise an
> animal to consume (wider sense), or not to raise it
> at all?"
>
> "i'll try again - is it more/less moral to raise an
> animal to consume (wider sense), or not to raise it
> at all?"
>
> He has been asked REPEATEDLY and civilly:
> "better"/"more moral" for whom or what?
>
> Why does JethroUK the coward keep EVADING the question?
>
>
> JethroUK the coward also has been asked, repeatedly and
> civilly, why he thinks it is important to draw
> attention to the unimportant "fact" that animals "get
> to live" only because they are bred to be eaten. He
> keeps whiffing off and EVADING that question, as well.
>
> Answer the questions, JethroUK the coward:
>
> 1. Why do you think your little "fact" merits any
> attention
> at all?
>
> 2. For whom or what might it be "better"/"more moral"
> in your earlier questions,
>
> "is it better to raise an animal to eat, or not to
> raise it at all?"
>
> "i'll rephrase that - is it better to raise an
> animal to consume (wider sense), or not to raise it
> at all?"
>
> "i'll try again - is it more/less moral to raise an
> animal to consume (wider sense), or not to raise it
> at all?"
>
>
> Answer the questions. Don't evade them, don't snip
> them out, just answer them.
>

Maybe Jethro comes from Wales, where they love their animals.
Really....Love them.