On Thu, 17 Jul 2008, Goo AGAIN cowardly slinked from the challenge:

>On Thu, 17 Jul 2008, dh AGAIN challenged the Goober:
>
>>On Wed, 16 Jul 2008, Goo lied:
>>
>>>On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 14:12:53 -0100, dh@. wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Thu, 10 Jul 2008, an inept Goober failed completely to defend his beliefs:
>>>>
>>>>>On Thu, 10 Jul 2008 17:25:26 -0100, dh@. wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>On Wed, 09 Jul 2008, Goo tried to defend the misnomer:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Goo - ****wit David Harrison, fat pig-****er and moronic cracker - lied
>>>>>>>and presented no challenge:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Thu, 03 Jul 2008, Goo tried to defend the misnomer:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Goo - ****wit David Harrison, fat pig-****er and moronic cracker - lied and presented no challenge:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 02 Jul 2008, Goo tried to defend the misnomer:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> preventing "future farm animals" (ugh) from existing does not
>>>>>>>>>>> make any animals worse off.
>>>>>>>>>> So what Goo?
>>>>>>>>> So, you don't have any point left, Goo.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The point is that "ar" is a gross misnomer Goo.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>No
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yes it is Goo. But since you want to argue that it's not
>>>>>>Goober, try explaining which rights you think it would
>>>>>>provide for which animals. Go:
>>>>>
>>>>>No
>>>>
>>>> LOL!!! You always fail Goo. Every one of you ALWAYS
>>>>fails to be able to explain which rights for which animals
>>>>Goober, proving that "ar" is a gross misnomer...proving it
>>>>time after time after time after time after time after time...
>>>>..............................after time after time............................
>>>>consistently!
>>>
>>>Win. I won
>>
>> You loose every time you fail completely to explain
>>which rights for which animals Goo,

>You ignorant pig-****ing cracker: LOSE, not "loose".

Which rights for which animals, Goo?