John Coleman wrote:

>>Arnold Ehret was no scientist, he was a racist quack,
>>who wrote, among other horseshit,

The white race is an unnatural, sick pathological
race. First, the colored skin pigment is lacking,
due to a lack of coloring mineral salts. Secondly,
the blood is continually overfilled by white
corpuscles, mucus, and waste with white color,
therefore the white appearance of his entire body...

The skin pores of the white man are constipated by
white, dry mucus...his entire system is filled up
and filled out with it. It's no wonder that he looks
white, pale and anemic. Everybody knows that an
extreme case of paleness is a bad sign.

LEAVE the horseshit in, John. There was no legitimate
rhetorical purpose served in cutting it out; you cut it
out because you're embarrassed to be a slavish follower
of a crackpot.

>
>
> You are right, he was no scientist.

Then you should be highly skeptical of everything he
writes that pretends to be a scientific finding.

> But even if a "racist quack" does a good
> experiment and reports it correctly,

....which he didn't do...

> he is still right. Similarly one can
> make some valid observations but create a hypothesis for them based on false
> assumptions.
>
> The white does man often looks a bit of a mess, it's been spotted by quite a
> few other so called "races".

It's all racist quackery and pseudo-scientific
gibberish. Sane people don't believe any of it.