View Single Post
  #21 (permalink)   Report Post  
Jonathan Ball
 
Posts: n/a
Default natural predators & a natural life is cruel? "Yes" - accordingto usual suspect AND NOW DUTCH

ipse dixit wrote:

> On Tue, 11 May 2004 11:49:38 -0700, "Dutch" > wrote:
>
>>"ipse dixit" > wrote
>>
>>>>>>>Dutch wrote:
>>>>>>>Cruel also means simply causing pain and
>>>>>>>suffering, based on that definition, nature
>>>>>>>is arguably more cruel than captivity.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>PERFECT! Thanks for offering your stupidity to this, Dutch.
>>>>>
>>>>>I JUST CAN'T STOP LAUGHING AT MY OWN COLOSSAL STUPIDITY!
>>>>
>>>>Well, suit yourself, prick-cheese.
>>>
>>>That timing was a peach. Admit it; you laughed your
>>>****ing head off. The perfect close to a long day.
>>>See you tomorrow, Jon.

>>
>>Scurry away

>
>
> "Get this, ****WIT:
>
> If a predator kills a prey animal, there is no moral
> meaning to it.
>
> If you prevent a predator from killing prey, you have
> not done a good deed.
>
> Comparing our treatment of livestock to predators'
> "treatment" of prey is misguided at best, and stupid
> when you keep doing it after having had explained to
> you why it's misguided.
>
> One more to jam down your throat with my boot,
> ****WIT: non-human predators are never cruel.
> They can't be."
> Jonathan Ball to a ****wit 2004-05-11
>
> It's clear that you believe natural predation is cruel
> and that removing it is a benefit to wild animals.


You're replying to a post by Dutch. How does offering
something I've said allow you to reach any conclusion
about what Dutch believes? You stupid fat ****.

You stupid, crippled, dying fat ****.