On 5 May 2004 23:32:39 -0700, (Auntie Nettles) wrote:

>Hello, k00kologists -- may I direct your attention to the following
>crossposted newsgroups, where you will see for yourselves a rather sad
>state of affairs. :-( ...To wit, a Usenet self-mutilation of sorts:
> k00ky posters inventing sockpuppet personas so they can beat
>themselves up with their other sockpuppet personas. Among other
>things.

Apart from his laughable attempts to invent sock
puppets, only to beat up on them and then claim a
hollow victory, Jonathan often changes his name
in an effort to hide his thoughts and behaviour from
his very young son who might one day look through
Google archives when he grows up. When warned
that his son will one day get to know his true father,
he responded, yet again under a different name;
;

"Predictions:

1. There will be no Google as we know it.
2. I will have gone through a few dozen e-mail
addresses by then. There are other people
with my name who post to usenet.
3. It will never occur to him to look to see if I
ever posted to Usenet. He won't care."
Jonathan Ball http://tinyurl.com/3ecox

It's clear that he wants to conceal his true self from
his own son, yet over the years he has hypocritically
attacked Karen Winter for concealing her true self
from her son, and claims that he is morally obligated
to convey her posts to him, thereby revealing her true
character;

"This much is clear: you are terribly afraid of your
son's reaction if he sees your words. It is YOUR
words you don't want your son to see, not anything
I might say about them."
Jonathan Ball http://tinyurl.com/36h6l

"You are withholding important information from
your son. That is immoral. It is not immoral for
me to convey what I know to your son."
Jonathan Ball http://tinyurl.com/2ygbn

Jonathan is one screwed up little hypocrite who
1) can't defeat real opponents
2) uses his opponent's identities to forge damaging
posts to undermine them
3) uses multiple names and email addresses to hide
his true self from his son while attacking others
who try to conceal their posts from their son.

He's completely and utterly unethical.

>I think you may find some fresh meat here -- (pun intended, hee hee
>hee...) Google Jonathan OR Jon Ball for starters...
>
>ipse dixit <f@chance> wrote in message >. ..
>> On Fri, 30 Apr 2004 13:24:59 -0400, "farrell77" > wrote:
>> >"ipse dixit" <f@chance> wrote in message ...
>> >>
>> >> Benfez has recently reappeared, or so it seems, but
>> >> denies making certain quotes concerning Salt's
>> >> essay, Logic of the larder. His quotes tell us he
>> >> lied;
>> >
>> >[...snip...]
>> >
>> >> It's Jonathan Ball posing as an old poster here, or
>> >> Benfez always was Jonathan to begin with.
>> >
>> >I thought it was jb right from the first couple posts. There
>> >are too many stylistic similarities and use of pet phrases. If
>> >Benfez is jb, then he's been much better behaved and this
>> >incarnation is a welcome improvement.
>>
>> I noted that both make the same claim in that they
>> independently arrived at Salt's conclusion before
>> reading his essay.
>>
>> "I accept his analysis, and in fact independently arrive
>> at it before I had even read Salt's essay."
>> Benfez 2004-04-29
>>
>> "I'd like to point out that I articulated the thought entirely
>> independently, before I had ever heard of Salt or anyone
>> else who says the same thing"
>> Jonathan Ball 2004-01-10
>>
>> "I arrived at the same conclusion independently, without
>> ever having heard of Salt."
>> Jonathan Ball 2004-02-20
>>
>> But why would Jon invent someone just to knock this bogus
>> person out of the ring later by stating things like?
>>
>> "I think any reference to the stupid argument should
>> have "****wit" and "David Harrison" in it. ****WIT
>> is the only idiot who believes it. Benfez thought he
>> believed it for a while, and that crippled shitworm
>> Dreck was cackling with glee over it, but the guy
>> abandoned it when the illogic of it was explained to
>> him. ****WIT is all alone, again."
>> Jonathan Ball 2004-02-02
>>
>> That's just so sad.