View Single Post
  #78 (permalink)   Report Post  
jRb
 
Posts: n/a
Default Tell me about rice

Please inform:

50000 Animals?

Explain please.......

I seriously doubt one would have witnessed much less counted that many. In
either event it's not a perfect world and you have to take the lesser of two
evils most often than not.

Perhaps we should investigate rice farming alternatives that may curb or
elliminate such deaths?

Has that been considered?


> wrote in message
...
> On Tue, 3 Feb 2004 14:58:03 -0000, "ipse dixit" > wrote:
>
> >
> > wrote in message

news
> >> On Sun, 1 Feb 2004 19:15:55 -0000, "ipse dixit" >

wrote:
> >> > wrote in message

...
> >> >> On Sat, 31 Jan 2004 10:04:44 -0000, "ipse dixit" >

wrote:
> >> >> > wrote in message

...
> >> >> >> On Thu, 29 Jan 2004 10:54:01 -0000, "ipse dixit"

> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> >> >How could he "never" have noticed the 50000+ animals
> >> >> >> >per acre being chopped to bits one minute,
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Similar to the way that you don't.
> >> >> >
> >> >> >I don't farm,
> >> >>
> >> >> or care about deaths of wildlife in rice production,
> >> >>
> >> >Ipse dixit and false.

> >
> >Aren't you going to retract your dishonest
> >claim that I don't care about the deaths of
> >wildlife,

>
> No, because you don't.
>
> >or are you going to continue lying
> >and making baseless claims instead?

>
> Baseless? There are plenty of CDs involved with
> rice production. If you cared about them, then THEY
> are what you would be focussed on, NOT on the
> ones that don't occur. Your only "care" is that you
> don't want people to believe they exist.
>
> >> >> >so it's impossible for me to
> >> >> >count them. Diderot claims to be a farmer
> >> >> >and a reliable eye witness, yet he never
> >> >> >noticed them to start with. He either has
> >> >> >very poor eyesight or he's lying. Either way
> >> >> >his anecdotal evidence must be ignored
> >> >>
> >> >> by people who don't care about deaths of wildlife in
> >> >> rice production.
> >> >>
> >> >By everyone, irrespective of their knowledge
> >> >on collateral deaths. No one can count 50000
> >> >shredded frogs flying past at the speed of a
> >> >nor'easter, so his anecdotal evidence must be
> >> >discarded by the fact of our limited capabilities.
> >> >

> >Well, Harrison? Isn't it a fact that our limited
> >capabilities prove that "Diderot" must certainly
> >have lied about what he claims to have counted?

>
> Let's see the quote in which he said that he counted them.
>
> >> >> >> >and then notice them in the next?
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> He lost you by a ***LONG!!!*** way there dix. He
> >> >> >> began to care at least enough to look, and lost you
> >> >> >> even farther by beginning to care.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >You haven't answered the question. How
> >> >> >could he never have noticed 50000+ frogs
> >> >> >flying past him per acre one minute,
> >> >>
> >> >> He didn't care, like you.
> >> >>
> >> >For the umpteenth time: answer the question.
> >> >"How could he never have noticed 50000+
> >> >frogs flying past him per acre one minute, and
> >> >then manage to count them the next?
> >> >

> >Answer the question or admit that he must
> >have lied about his numbers. He claims that
> >"the number of frogs swimming across the
> >cutter-bar is so massive, we have to change
> >to a smaller header a/o severely reduce travel
> >speed.", yet he says he never noticed them
> >until he looked. If that were true, then it stands
> >to reason he never had to change to a smaller
> >header prior to noticing them, so he's clearly
> >lying because had he not changed to a smaller
> >header he would've noticed that waterfall long
> >ago.

>
> Being more interested in the truth than you
> are, I would have to hear his side of it before
> forming an opinion about whether he lied,
> exaggerated, or simply shared what he saw in
> the field.
>
> >> >> >and then
> >> >> >manage to count them the next?
> >> >>
> >> >> He began to care, unlike you.
> >> >>
> >> >No one can count that many shredded frogs
> >> >flying by them, no matter how they cared, so
> >> >admit Diderot lied, Harrison!
> >> >

> >Why don't you answer?
> >
> >> >> >> >He's lying.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> No. YOU are lying. He may have exagerated
> >> >> >
> >> >> >He did much more than exagerate and his
> >> >> >contradictory quotes prove it. Those quotes
> >> >> >and the impossible task in counting that many
> >> >> >frogs per acre prove that he lied about this
> >> >> >issue.
> >> >>
> >> >> How many frogs do die per acre?
> >> >>
> >> >Show one ounce of integrity for once in your
> >> >life
> >>
> >> It seems that you're the one failing in that area.

> >
> >I'm giving you the facts while you try to defend
> >his obvious lies, so why do you say that it is I
> >who is short on integrity here?
> >
> >> You want people to believe that the number of
> >> animals killed in rice production should not be
> >> given any consideration, regardless of how many
> >> there are.
> >>

> >Since when have I ever tried to claim these deaths
> >should not be given any consideration, liar? Show
> >me your proof of this claim in your reply or retract
> >it.

>
> How many should be considered? How many
> actually occur?
>
> >> >and admit Diderot lied about his numbers.
> >>
> >> I don't know whether he lied about them or not.

> >
> >You do know that he lied based on our limited
> >capabilities to physically count the numbers he
> >provided here. He claims the numbers were so
> >high that he had to slow down or change to a
> >shorter header, yet prior to looking he claims
> >he never noticed them.

>
>
>