"Saerah" > wrote in message
...
>
> ipse dixit wrote in message ...
> >On Sat, 17 Jan 2004 13:22:46 -0500, "Saerah" >
> wrote:
> >>ipse dixit wrote in message ...
> >>>On Sat, 17 Jan 2004 11:08:00 -0500, "Saerah"
> >wrote:
> >>>>ipse dixit wrote in message ...
> >>>><snip BS>
> >>>>
> >>>That material you snipped away showing the
> >>>fact that farmers intentionally lie to their
> >>>customers isn't BS, so let's put it all back again
> >>>before you proceed to show where USDA are
> >>>lying.
> >>
> >>i only snipped for brevity- you've posted this plenty of times.
> >
> >Then you have no excuse for your error in thinking
> >I wrote *all* farmers are lying, have you?
> >
> >> i'm not
> >>saying that *some* farmers are dishonest, i'm just saying that its
> illogical
> >>for you to infer that *all* managers of livestock are lying simply
becasue
> >>*some* are.
> >>
> >And where have I written *all* farmers are lying?
> >If you took the time to read the threads more
> >thoroughly before jumping in and making an arse
> >of yourself you might have noticed I've addressed
> >your point before now.
> >
> >[start usual suspect]
> >>Note your own source: *SOME*. Not all.
> >[me]
> >That's right, and I've never said otherwise.
> >[end]
> >
>
> yes, but then you follow up the quoted material by saying "farmers lie".
> which implies that "all farmers lie", if you dont qualify your statement.

It's called equivocation, it's one of the many tools of deception this idiot
uses to misrepresent the truth.