FoodBanter.com - View Single Post

wrote in message >. ..
> On 4 Jan 2004 16:30:24 -0800, (Purple) wrote:
>
> wrote in message >. ..
> >> On 3 Jan 2004 19:46:19 -0800, (Purple) wrote:
> >>
> >> >I'm no vegan and I can see that testing on animals for
> >> >something as trivial as a new, slightly improved cosmetic
> >> >is morally very wrong.
> >>
> >> Do you think it would be morally correct to just put it
> >> on the market and see what happens?
> >
> >Not if there is a significant risk to human health because it
> >hasn't been adequately tested.
>
> Tested how?
>
> >If new ingredients can not be
> >developed without animal testing we should just make do with
> >what he already have.
> __________________________________________________ _______
> If scientists could replace animal research and testing
> with methods which did not need to use animals then
> they would.
>
> There are several reasons for this:

[snip]

All irrelevent. I was talking specifically about cosmetics
testing.