View Single Post
  #114 (permalink)   Report Post  
Tim
 
Posts: n/a
Default No need for farm animals.


"Jahnu" > wrote in message
...
> On Sun, 4 Jan 2004 10:43:45 -0500, "Tim" <aaa> wrote:
>
> >FYI. A moose is not a human. Moose have a tendency to be covered in hair.

>
> But a wolf has more hair, so that would defeat your notion that you
> need meat to develop layers of fat to keep warm in a cold climate.
>
> >Avacados and what ever else you ate don't grow in -30c. Also you probably
> >lived in a heated house. Still moose aren't human. And you call my point
> >moronic - ha.

>
> What are we talking about now? Do you mean to say that because they
> can't grow vegetables in minus 30 it is alright to slaughter animals
> en masse where they CAN grow vegetables and where it is not necessary
> to eat meat to survive? Either you are confused or you are being
> deliberately obtrusive.
>
> >Like you point out veggies don't grow where Eskimos live. How then can

they
> >be herbivores?

>
> Who said they were?
>
> >The fat afforded by certain veggies will not help someone
> >exposed to the elements.

>
> Sure it will. It's just that the vegetables are not available there.
> As you can see in the example with the moose they have no problem
> living in extreme cold climates even though they have shorter hairs
> than the carnivores who live under the same conditions.
>
> >Again living in a nice heated house doesn't equate
> >you with an Eskimo or Siberian.

>
> Is that your argument for eating meat - that eskimos do it? Where is
> the sense in that?
>
>


Life is not an argument. Humans are omnivores. Bye Bye.

> www.krishna.com
> www.iskcon.org
>