"Susan Kennedy" > wrote in message
...
>
> "rick etter" > wrote in message
> ...
> >
> > "Susan Kennedy" > wrote in message
> > ...
> > >
> > > "Rat & Swan" > wrote in message
> >
> > snippage...
> >
> > >
> > > Personally, I don't see that AR will ever become that accepted.
> > --------------
> > She knows that too. It's just that she can't help herself with her
> > knee-jerk spews.
> > There wouldn't be crops, power, gas, transportation, heating, any number
> of
> > things in the world if animals had rights.
> > Afterall, you wouldn't be able to plow them under or poison them to keep
> > your food clean and cheap, or process them for storage and shipment.
> > Her own usenet spews contribute to the death and suffering of animals,
yet
> > here she is, continueing for nothing more than her entertainment.
>
> Much as I hate to say it, you're reactions sound pretty knee-jerk to me.
> Not that I don't agree with some of what you say, but I really gotta say -
> if I were on the fence, the way you say it would likely push me over on
her
> side, even if only temporarily.
==================
That's the point. her side is bogus, and she knows it. Winning a
miss-congeniality isn't my thing. Pointing out her lys and delusions is.
btw, she also supports *** sex with young boys. She has no problem with
nambla, and even supports them. Animals she'll say she protects, yet she
can't bring herself to condemn queers that prey on little boys. Her whole
belief system is so skewed as to be irrelevant.



>
>