Rat & Swan wrote:

>
>
> Jonathan Ball wrote:
>
> <snip>
>
>> You have to understand something, something that's crucial to figuring
>> out "aras". They have a rigid, all-encompassing view of the
>> human-animal relationship continuum. They will strive at all times to
>> remain consistent with their fundamental view: that human use of
>> animals is evil. What they don't get, and never will, is that they
>> continually prove the truth of Emerson's observation: "A foolish
>> consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds."
>
>
> And if you read what I said to Rubystars on the subject, it will be
> obvious that, as always, you are again wrong about me.

I am 100% right about you. You exhibit EXACTLY the
foolish consistency against which Emerson railed.

>
> You'll never get it.

Oh, I get you completely. There isn't much to get.