Eat less meat
Old Codger wrote:
> On Sat, 22 Mar 2008 20:06:04 -0400, ah > wrote:
>
>>Old Codger wrote:
>>> On Fri, 21 Mar 2008 06:33:44 -0700 (PDT), Buxqi >
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Mar 21, 10:48 am, Old Codger >
>>>>wrote:
>>>>> On Thu, 20 Mar 2008 10:58:04 -0700 (PDT), Buxqi >
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> >On 20 Mar, 16:21, Old Codger > wrote:
>>>>> >> Tom Withycombe wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> >> > I'm obviously suffering from mental constipation but could someone
>>>>> >> > enlighten me as to what this rubbish has to do with a ng dedicated to
>>>>> >> > British birdwatching?
>>>>>
>>>>> >> Nothing at all Tom, just as it has little relevance to many of the
>>>>> >> groups to which it is cross posted.
>>>>>
>>>>> >Of course the problem could be alleviated if everyone replying
>>>>> >to the guy removed all the irrelevant groups from the cross-post
>>>>> >first.
>>>>>
>>>>> That requires aptitude and common sense. Something the troll netkops
>>>>> don't possess.
>>>>>
>>>>> >> However, Pete is so desperate for
>>>>> >> attention that he always cross posts to at least six groups.
>>>>>
>>>>> >Why does he post to small groups instead of large ones if
>>>>> >that is his motivation?
>>>>>
>>>>> Education for all I should imagine.
>>>>
>>>>The point is people don't sign up to groups like uk.rec.birdwatching
>>>>to discuss animal rights.
>>>
>>> People don't sign up anyway. If you want a sheltered world exclusively
>>> for weirdo's who cannot face reality then go start a moderated
>>> newsgroup on your own.
>>>
>>> On a public forum you get to see everything the public want you to
>>> see. Animal rights and global destruction are issues for us all even
>>> birdwatchers.
>>>
>>> What kind of ponce can pretend otherwise?
>>
>>Hear! Hear!
>
> Parakeet?
Will one do?
>
> What am I Tiwit, towoo?
Twixt?
>
>>>
>>>>> >> In
>>>>> >> addition, he frequently nymshifts in attempts to avoid the kill filters.
>>>>>
>>>>> >If they don't want to read his posts he should respect that...
>>>>>
>>>>> That's a bit like saying a newspaper should be tailored to individual
>>>>> wants. Nonsense. Most of the netkops just want comics and dirty
>>>>> magazines to read. In Brian's (Old Codger from Bicknacre in Essex)
>>>>> case he just wants dirty magazines portraying bestiality subjects.
>>>>>
>>>>> The simple fact is if you don't want to read something then DON'T, but
>>>>> please don't proceed and feel the world needs to know about your
>>>>> decision.
>>>>>
>>>>> We simply don't care.
>>>>
>>>>That's not the point. I wasn't question whether he should continue
>>>>posting to *relevant* newsgroups. If he wants to then of course he
>>>>should! But worming around people's killfiles, I don't agree with
>>>>that...
>>>
>>> Learn to use filters then. Pro hunt extremists have been known to
>>> track down and harm people so it's wise to keep on the run especially
>>> if you are providing a public service.
>>>
>>> Netkopping is despised the world over these days far more so than
>>> crossposting devils. You'd do well to understand that before you start
>>> trying to educate us into world of netkop weirdo's.
>>>
>>>>> >> > By all means discuss this in the fullest possible detail in the vegan, veggie, environmentally aware landfill sites,
>>>>> >> > methane and related gases and such focussed groups but please don't dump
>>>>> >> > this rubbish in the British birdwatching group. After all you have
>>>>> >> > around 60,000 other newsgroups to choose.
>>>>>
>>>>> Every one should be aware of the problem the planet faces.
>>>>
>>>>The planet has many problems. People who want to discuss them
>>>>or learn about them do not join uk.rec.birdwatching to learn about
>>>>them. End of.
>>>
>>> You think it's ok for everyone else to fight your battles do you? I
>>> prefer to kick netkpops up the arse so shove that up your chuffer.
>>>
>>>>> Even if you
>>>>> are sad twitcher who likes to hide away in dark bushes pretending to
>>>>> look for birds but usually just peeping toms!
>>>
>
--
ah
|