"Ipse dixit" > wrote in message
...
>
> "Ray" > wrote in message
...
> > "Ipse dixit" > wrote in message
...
> > > "Ray" > wrote in message
...
> > > > "Ipse dixit" > wrote in message
...
> > >
> > > > > > > yeah yeah yeah.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > Obviously Jon is another one to add to your 'Hypocrite List':-)
> > > > > >
> > > > > Everyone is a potential candidate, Ray, but unlike you,
> > > > > Jon's support for animals and his reasons for participating
> > > > > here have never been in doubt. I bit his head off because
> > > > > he stupidly took the emphasis away from a huge milestone
> > > > > I spent a lot of time developing: getting Etter to make a
> > > > > statement which would prove the CD argument has a
> > > > > double standard.
> > > > >
> > > > > He should have picked another thread to post his views
> > > > > on the ways to reduce the farmers CDs, or make another
> > > > > one of his own rather than divert my attack on Rick away
> > > > > with a bunch of crap on the issue which I already knew
> > > > > about. That's why I asked, "Don't you get what's going on
> > > > > here anymore, or something, Jon? What's the matter with
> > > > > you?" He sometimes misses some of the more subtle
> > > > > going's-on which are particular and unique to a.a.e.v. and
> > > > > t.p.a.
> > > > >-----------No snippage-----------
> > > > >
> > > > Derek,
> > > > I hope you consider the following as constructive, it is
> > > > meant that way.
> > > >
> > > > [Everyone is a potential candidate] A candidate for what
> > > > Derek? Someone who does not share your views 100%
> > > > and therefore has to be branded a hypocrite?
> > > >
> > > No, a candidate to be added to my list of who I
> > > regard as hypocrites. There are many here who
> > > I disagree with that aren't on that list. For example;
> > >
> > > "Murdering Mercer holds the principle that 1 rabbit
> > > should die if it saves 1000 human lives, and this is
> > > exactly the same principle held by Zakhar. The huge
> > > difference between Zakhar and Mercer, is that
> > > Mercer has put his principles into practice and
> > > spent his entire life studying real damn hard to
> > > perfect a way to do it as painlessly as possible,
> > > using the least amount of animals. I don't agree
> > > with Zakhar or Mercer's principles, but at least
> > > Mercer has the guts to stand by his and argue his
> > > position somewhat openly. I can cope with that,
> > > but what annoys me more than anything is a
> > > coward who would willingly allow animals to
> > > die according to his own acceptable ratio while
> > > criticising others who do it professionally,
> > > especially if they're also claiming to be an ARA,
> > > because it makes the rest of us who don't accept
> > > any ratio at all equally hypocritical if we defend
> > > his double standard as you do."
> > > Derek 2003-10-08
> > >
> > > > In recent weeks you have tried to go through us
> > > > all like a dose of salts,
> > >
> > > So what? Unlike you, I'm free to take issue with
> > > whoever I like, whatever their label. Deal with it.
> >
> > Right, I'll make a good start - **** you and all your
> > stupid attempts to gain promininence on this Newsgroup.
> > You have failed and you are a complete and utter disaster
> > zone for AR posters.
> >
> Was that little outburst supposed to be "a good start" in
> dealing with me?

I don't have to deal with you any longer. Put your opinion to the vote:-)
>
> > Deal with that council house cleric.
> >
> > You ****ing mercer bumboy.
>
> It's Zakhar and yourself that supports Mercer's ethic
> on using animals for research. Not me

OK I'm game.
>
>
>