<dh@.> wrote in message news
> On Mon, 17 Mar 2008 21:56:10 GMT, "Dutch" > wrote:
>
>><dh@.> wrote in message ...
>>> On Fri, 14 Mar 2008 06:55:29 -0700 (PDT), Dragonblaze
>>> > wrote:
>>>
>>>>On 12 Mar, 07:25, Osvald Hotz De Baar >
>>>>wrote:
>>>>> On Wed, 12 Mar 2008 06:39:06 GMT, "Dutch" > wrote:
>>>>> >"( _ /)" > wrote
>>>>> >> Eat less meat
>>>>>
>>>>> >How about just eat less, consume less, PERIOD? Why pick on meat? You
>>>>> >wouldn't have an ummm hidden agenda, would you?
>>>>>
>>>>> Obesity is a serious problem due to animal products entirely. So
>>>>> therefore Eat less meat
>>>>
>>>>So if I had a diet of chips (that's French fries to Americans) which
>>>>are completely vegan - just potatoes, oil and salt - I would never get
>>>>fat, is that what you're REALLY claiming?
>>>>
>>>>I'll never be able to understand faith-heads of any stripe....
>>>
>>> I've recently learned that strong atheists are most amusing
>>> about their faith. I was first amused to learn that they deny
>>> their faith that the tooth fairy doesn't exist, also Santa and
>>> the Easter Bunny, etc. Then I was more amused to learn
>>> they deny their own faith in the possibility that a creator
>>> does not exist, and later that they deny their own faith in
>>> everything they have faith in, including their faith that the
>>> Earth will continue to rotate. How screwed up can you get?
>>
>>People who claim to be "amused" are usually "confused".
>
> Did you hear that on TV or something?


Nope, you're transparent, you used the word three times in that paragraph,
you are not amused, you protest too much, you're in a horrible muddle.