View Single Post
  #40 (permalink)   Report Post  
rick etter
 
Posts: n/a
Default Want to be a vegetarian


"C. James Strutz" > wrote in message
...
>
> "Jonathan Bald" > wrote in message
> k.net...
> > See James Strut wrote:

>
> > > NO! It's the cattle industry that's
> > > responsible for most collateral deaths, not vegans.

> >
> > The raw number isn't important, ASSHOLE.

>
> It is important for people to keep it in perspective. You want to
> conveniently sweep it under the carpet and hope that nobody notices.
>
> > > Vegans contribute to
> > > negligible collateral deaths in comparison.

> >
> > The comparison is invalid, ASSHOLE. It's still a very
> > big number and there are very big problems with it:
> >
> > 1. The number is large.

>
> How large?

=================
Millions and millions... and that's just the birds....


>
> > 2. "vegans", sanctimonious assholes, don't care to know
> > how big it is.

>
> I care to know. Tell me.

===============
No you don't or you'd have already looked into it, killer.


>
> > 3. The deaths could be avoided.

>
> NOt all of them, not practically.

===============
Yes, they could. Only not and maintain your consumer driven, conveninec
oriented lifestyle. You just prove that your comfort comes far ahead of
your so-called ethics and concern for animals...


>
> > 4. There are no consequences for the deaths.

>
> There are no consequences for slaughter of cattle for food. What do you
> think the consequences should be?

==================
Yes, there are if they are not performed correctly. despite the AR/vegan
display of the same pics over and over, the industry does not operate the
way you seem to think.



>
> > 5. "vegans" do NOTHING, not a ****ING THING, to
> > try to stop causing the deaths.

>
> And what are you doing to stop the slaughter of cattle? Answer: NOTHING,

you
> could care less. Yet you condemn vegetarians and vegans for incidental
> deaths from agriculture.

=================
Hey, idiot, we don't claim to say our diet is all about 'saving' animals.
Animals die for food, period. It's neither good nor bad, just the way it
is. You cannot, and will not ever change that. Now, you on the other hand
make all kinds of claims about caring and minizing/eliminating animal death
and suffering. yet you do nothing to accomplish this claimed goal. In
fact, you prove that you go out of your way to cause even more unnecessary
death and suffering that doesn't concern your 'survival' with each and every
innane post you make to usenet. If, as you say, you(AR/vegans) go to great
lengths to ensure that your 'body-count- is minimized, why are you here?




d? So you're here to punish vegans?
> >
> > No. Wrongful deaths should be punished.

>
> How would you propose to punish the slaughter houses then?

======================
I don't. Nobody does. They aren't wrongful deaths. they provide a source
of food and a livelihood for people. Now, the deaths you cause are just
that, deaths, the animals are left to rot.


>
> > There are no consequences for the collateral animal
> > deaths in agriculture, and "vegans" are integral to
> > their occurrence.

>
> What consequences? There are no consequences for slaughtering cattle for

the
> steaks you eat. Why should there be consequences for incidental deaths
> caused from agriculture? You are incoherent and a hypocryte.
> ===========================

No stupid, that's the point. You are the hypocrite. You claim it's wrong
to kill animals and eat them, yet you have no qualms about killing even more
and leaving them to rot.


> > >>>You have no facts.
> > >>
> > >>We have the massive, crushing fact of collateral animal
> > >>deaths in agriculture, which you ACKNOWLEDGE.
> > >
> > >
> > > Then produce the facts that back up your assertions.

> >
> > I have: the massive, crushing fact of collateral
> > animal deaths in agriculture, which you ACKNOWLEDGE above.

>
> You have NEVER produced any facts. You only make flaming assertions that

you
> can't back up.

================
They have been posted many, many times. try using your computer for
something other than your typical spews that cause unnecessary animal death
and suffering...


>
> > Very much so, jimmy. You are disgustingly incoherent
> > on ethics, and you are a stinking hypocrite and liar.

>
> Funny, that's my impression of you.

===============
Name a ly. Just one...


>
>