"LordSnooty" > wrote in message
news:up2uovg141r88ve5k5a3jk2ogjprujkct8@earthlink. net...
> On Thu, 16 Oct 2003 20:56:41 GMT, wrote:
>
> >On Thu, 16 Oct 2003 12:12:49 -0400, LordSnooty >
wrote:
> >
> >>On Thu, 16 Oct 2003 14:54:11 GMT, Jonathan Ball
> > wrote:
> >>
> >>>brad beattie wrote:
> >>>> ----- Message Text -----
> >>>> |But you don't only eat carrots. You eat rice and
> >>>> |cereal grains and all kinds of thing whose production
> >>>> |and distribution causes the death of animals. You
> >>>> |simply don't eat the animals that are killed. They are
> >>>> |just as dead, irrespective of if you eat them.
> >>>>
> >>>> The processes that result in carrots and rice and so forth for us to
> >>>> consume is not, by its nature, dependant upon the death of animals.
> >>>
> >>>Irrelevant. Animals die, and you buy the stuff whose
> >>>production and distribution caused the death.
> >>
> >>This is fallacy of the kind usually supported by your less intelligent
> >>friends like Clutch Wetter.
> >[...]
> >
> >Facts that veg*ns want to disregard:
> >
> >6. Veg*ns contribute to most of the same animal deaths that everyone
> > else does by their use of wood, paper, roads, buildings, electricity,
> > things that contain animal by-products, and the veggies they eat.
>
> Fallacy.
================
No, truth, killer...

All things meat eaters do, therefore by it's very nature a
> vegan diet means the meat animals are taken out of the picture. Your
> maths are very bad.
================
Your ignorance is appalling...


>
> >7. Some types of meat involve fewer animal deaths than some types of
> > veggies.
>
> Fallacy.
===============
Fact...


>
> >8. Some types of meat involve less animal suffering than some types of
> > veggies.
>
> Fallacy.
==============
Fact...