View Single Post
  #67 (permalink)   Report Post  
Cash Cow
 
Posts: n/a
Default Facts we should *not* consider.

wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Oct 2003 12:12:49 -0400, LordSnooty > wrote:
>
>
>>On Thu, 16 Oct 2003 14:54:11 GMT, Jonathan Ball
> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>brad beattie wrote:
>>>
>>>>----- Message Text -----
>>>>|But you don't only eat carrots. You eat rice and
>>>>|cereal grains and all kinds of thing whose production
>>>>|and distribution causes the death of animals. You
>>>>|simply don't eat the animals that are killed. They are
>>>>|just as dead, irrespective of if you eat them.
>>>>
>>>>The processes that result in carrots and rice and so forth for us to
>>>>consume is not, by its nature, dependant upon the death of animals.
>>>
>>>Irrelevant. Animals die, and you buy the stuff whose
>>>production and distribution caused the death.

>>
>>This is fallacy of the kind usually supported by your less intelligent
>>friends like Clutch Wetter.

>
> [...]
>
> Facts that veg*ns want to disregard:
>
> 6. Veg*ns contribute to most of the same animal deaths that everyone
> else does by their use of wood, paper, roads, buildings, electricity,
> things that contain animal by-products, and the veggies they eat.


Okay so far...

> 7. Some types of meat involve fewer animal deaths than some types of
> veggies.


Oooooh! You stumbled badly, ****wit.

SOME vegetables and fruit involve no death whatever,
and a person could fairly easily grow and eat only
these vegetables and fruits. Not so with meat, unless
a person is going to eat nothing but roadkill.

> 8. Some types of meat involve less animal suffering than some types of
> veggies.




The fact that ****wit wants to disregard: we all see
through your lamebrained, ****witted trick to try to
"promote life" for farm animals irrespective of the
quality of life.