![]() |
|
Welcome to FoodBanter.com forums which provide access to the finest food and drink related newsgroups. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most newsgroup discussions and access our other FREE features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics to the food related newsgroups, communicate privately with other FoodBanter.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload your own photos and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact support. |
|
|||||||
| Winemaking (rec.crafts.winemaking) Discussion of the process, recipes, tips, techniques and general exchange of lore on the process, methods and history of wine making. Includes traditional grape wines, sparkling wines & champagnes. |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
"Marty Phee" wrote in message . net... What exactly does this do it a wine? I saw one post that said a "Yeasty flavor". I didn't think you wanted that? The French describe the effect as the lees "feeding the wine". That's not very technical, I know, but it's possibly more useful to describe it in terms of its effect than to delve into geek-speak. The overall effect is to improve the mouth feel of the wine, softening and broadening the palate and making the wine taste richer and fuller. It also improves the nose, lending a bit of bread dough aroma that is very pleasant - particularly in full ML white wines. OTOH, if you're making a flowery, fruity style wine you might find that sur lie isn't appropriate for that. It's a stylistic choice, and that's one of the things that makes winemaking interesting. There are so many combinations... Tom S www.chateauburbank.com |
|
|||
|
Is it Sur Lies or Sur Lees? I've seen both.
Tom S wrote: "Marty Phee" wrote in message . net... What exactly does this do it a wine? I saw one post that said a "Yeasty flavor". I didn't think you wanted that? The French describe the effect as the lees "feeding the wine". That's not very technical, I know, but it's possibly more useful to describe it in terms of its effect than to delve into geek-speak. |
|
|||
|
Tom S wrote "The overall effect is to improve the mouth feel of the wine, softening and broadening the palate and making the wine taste richer and fuller. It also improves the nose, lending a bit of bread dough aroma that is very pleasant - particularly in full ML white wines." Tom, I know you barrel ferment Chardonnay. Do you leave the wine on the gross lees in the barrels until you rack and fill or age in another container or do you rack off the gross lees before barrel aging? Thanks. Bill Frazier Olathe, Kansas USA |
|
|||
|
"William Frazier" wrote in message
... Tom, I know you barrel ferment Chardonnay. Do you leave the wine on the gross lees in the barrels until you rack and fill or age in another container or do you rack off the gross lees before barrel aging? Hi, Bill - The wine stays on all its lees without racking until it's time to get it ready for bottling. Typically that's about ten months. I stir the lees about once a month. Tom S www.chateauburbank.com |
|
|||
|
If I go to the store will a Chardonnay say if it's been done with sur lies?
I'm interested to see what this tastes like. Next week I'm going to start a Brehm Chardonnay. Tom S wrote: "William Frazier" wrote in message ... Tom, I know you barrel ferment Chardonnay. Do you leave the wine on the gross lees in the barrels until you rack and fill or age in another container or do you rack off the gross lees before barrel aging? Hi, Bill - The wine stays on all its lees without racking until it's time to get it ready for bottling. Typically that's about ten months. I stir the lees about once a month. Tom S www.chateauburbank.com |
|
|||
|
Some do and some do not tell you if they were sur lie aged.
In addition some go through MLF and some do not, which they may or may not tell you about further complicating the flavor. Also, some are oak aged and some are not, which again they may or may not tell you about. There is quite a bit of variation in the world of chardonnay. If you really want to know each will affect the wine, you could get a chardonnay kit, allow one gallon to go through MLF, sur lie and oak; another MLF and sur lie aging, another only sur lie, another only MLF, and another only oak. The last gallon you could leave untouched. Of course there are variations that we did not cover (sur lie/oak and malolactic/oak), but unfortunately, kits do not come in 8 gallons. |
|
|||
|
"Marty Phee" wrote in message
. net... If I go to the store will a Chardonnay say if it's been done with sur lies? I'm interested to see what this tastes like. Next week I'm going to start a Brehm Chardonnay. Sometimes it'll say on the label; sometimes on the winery's website. Many years ago when I first started doing sur lie on my Chardonnay it was rather uncommon and considered risky. Most Chardonnay was cold tank fermented and racked from the lees into barrels for aging. There's still a lot of that nowadays, but it's mostly the big bulk producers. The boutique producers very often do sur lie aging. Your Brehm Chardonnay should be a good candidate for sur lie - even if you're doing it in a carboy rather than a barrel. The most important things a (1) Get the juice well settled - as clear as possible - before fermentation. BTW, prior to fermentation is the time to dump in wood chips if you're oaking your wine. You can leave them in through the sur lie aging process. (2) Use yeast nutrient and vitamin additions, spaced over the course of the fermentation. Chardonnay is notoriously nutrient deficient and that tends to promote H2S problems, as well as stuck fermentations. (3) Keep a vigilant nose out for signs of H2S formation. (4) When the fermentation has just about pooped out, stir the bottom every few days to prevent a reductive condition in the lees during ML. Of those 4 items, the first and second seem to be the most important. Certain yeast strains are known to tend to produce H2S, and it's best to avoid them. Montrachet is a known offender (Although I haven't had H2S problems with it, I find it far too vigorous for white wine fermentations). CY3079 is clean, as is VL2 and Epernay II (both low foamers), although I wouldn't recommend the latter for juice much over 23° Brix because of its tendency to stick off-dry. Good luck! Tom S www.chateauburbank.com |
|
|||
|
Droopy wrote: If you really want to know each will affect the wine, you could get a chardonnay kit, allow one gallon to go through MLF, sur lie and oak; another MLF and sur lie aging, another only sur lie, another only MLF, and another only oak. The last gallon you could leave untouched. Of course there are variations that we did not cover (sur lie/oak and malolactic/oak), but unfortunately, kits do not come in 8 gallons. Good idea with one caveat - kits are not a good source for this experiment because the manufacturers tweak their acid balance to contain more malic acid than the juice would normally have. MLF on kits would then result in a really flabby wine. Get fresh juice instead. Pp |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| The State of the Union, Health care and more lies from the President | Oelewapper | General Cooking | 203 | 12-06-2004 06:22 PM |
| Lies at Texas Roadhouse | Master Chef Richard Campbell | General Cooking | 66 | 03-06-2004 11:42 PM |
| Evil pedophile is MANIPULATION and LIES | 322 | Vegan | 1 | 31-03-2004 08:08 AM |
| Dr. Andrew B. Chung lies again WAS: Waist circumference is a better predictor of hypertension than BMI | Last Shot At The Mu_n | General Cooking | 1 | 07-02-2004 06:11 AM |
| Dr. Andrew B. Chung lies again WAS: Waist circumference is a better predictor of hypertension than BMI | Last Shot At The Mu_n | Preserving | 1 | 07-02-2004 06:11 AM |