A Food and drink forum. FoodBanter.com

Welcome to FoodBanter.com forums which provide access to the finest food and drink related newsgroups.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most newsgroup discussions and access our other FREE features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics to the food related newsgroups, communicate privately with other FoodBanter.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload your own photos and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact support.

Go Back   Home » FoodBanter.com forum » Drinking » Winemaking
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Winemaking (rec.crafts.winemaking) Discussion of the process, recipes, tips, techniques and general exchange of lore on the process, methods and history of wine making. Includes traditional grape wines, sparkling wines & champagnes.

Alcohol Content



 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #61 (permalink)  
Old 16-01-2005, 05:09 PM
de sik
Usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

May I ask whether you make any deductions for TA and other non-sugar solids
or just take the readings of the refractometer as fermentable sugar? I am
considering to buy a refractometer, because I am beginning to get fed up
with the unreliable readings of the hydrometer.

Ed


"Paul E. Lehmann" schreef in bericht
...
frederick ploegman wrote:

Jerry

Comments interspersed:


"Jerry DeAngelis" wrote in message
ink.net...

1.) I never personally calculate end point alcohol using hydrometers,
but
I do agree that many need/want to do that .


For the great majority of winemakers, this is a need, not a want.


Just my to put my two cents into this spirited debate.

I have been making wine for over 35 years now. Several years ago I
discovered the advantages of a refractometer. I believe this is a more
direct method of measuring the sugar content. I do not know of fruit
growers who depend on a hydrometer to determine sugar content. They use a
refractometer.

Now, I never depend on the hydrometer for starting numbers.
I only use the hydrometer to check on the progress of fermentation and to
determine if it is complete. In my opinion the beginning BRIX will give a
better estimate of the POTENTIAL ABV.

In my opinion it is not all that important if the finished wine is 12% ABV
or 13% ABV I am more interested in taste and balance. In my opinion the
beginning BRIX will give a better ESTIMATE of the POTENTIAL ABV.

I have designed recipes using the refractometer. One can get the sugar
content of any fruit with a refractometer. I would not depend on a
hydrometer for this purpose - nor do fruit growers.

Of course if one is dealing with other than pressed juice or liquids only,
then one must estimate the final yield of liquid juice. This is true
regardless of whether one is using a hydrometer or a refractometer. A
hydrometer will not tell you how much juice is going to be extracted
during
the fermentation process. A refractometer will not tell you this either
but it WILL tell you a more precise value for the sugar content of the
fruit. Hopefully you will keep track of my much water you use in your
recipe and then at pressing you will know the volume of juice plus water
and be able to back calculate and tell how much juice was extracted. You
can then go back and make adjustments by either adding more sugar or using
a bit more water if necessary.

I believe that if one is hung up on the ABV of the final product - Send it
out to a lab.

If one is a beginner or can not afford a refractometer my advise is to
just
be content to use ball park numbers and estimates based on the hydrometer.
In the long term it is not going to be that critical if other things are
in
balance.



  #62 (permalink)  
Old 16-01-2005, 05:54 PM
Paul E. Lehmann
Usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

de sik wrote:

May I ask whether you make any deductions for TA and other non-sugar
solids or just take the readings of the refractometer as fermentable
sugar? I am considering to buy a refractometer, because I am beginning to
get fed up with the unreliable readings of the hydrometer.

Ed


No, I do not make any deductions for TA and other non-sugar solids from the
refractometer readings as I believe this to be insignificant. I do,
however measure pH - especially with reds and TA and pH with whites but I
do not use this information to adjust the refractometer readings.

I believe some winemakers tend to "Over Science" winemaking. Most of the
time getting in the right ball park is close enough. There are SO MANY
variables in Organic Chemistry - which is what wine making is all about -
that it is nearly impossible to compensate and or measure all the
variables. I am not saying that it is wrong to understand what you are
doing but there comes a point in which further knowledge does not
necessarily yield better results.
  #63 (permalink)  
Old 16-01-2005, 05:54 PM
Paul E. Lehmann
Usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

de sik wrote:

May I ask whether you make any deductions for TA and other non-sugar
solids or just take the readings of the refractometer as fermentable
sugar? I am considering to buy a refractometer, because I am beginning to
get fed up with the unreliable readings of the hydrometer.

Ed


No, I do not make any deductions for TA and other non-sugar solids from the
refractometer readings as I believe this to be insignificant. I do,
however measure pH - especially with reds and TA and pH with whites but I
do not use this information to adjust the refractometer readings.

I believe some winemakers tend to "Over Science" winemaking. Most of the
time getting in the right ball park is close enough. There are SO MANY
variables in Organic Chemistry - which is what wine making is all about -
that it is nearly impossible to compensate and or measure all the
variables. I am not saying that it is wrong to understand what you are
doing but there comes a point in which further knowledge does not
necessarily yield better results.
  #64 (permalink)  
Old 17-01-2005, 09:09 PM
Bob
Usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Paul E. Lehmann" wrote
I believe some winemakers tend to "Over Science" winemaking.


You said a mouthful. I have a bag in my supply bucket just for all the
little bottles of this and that that I never ever use, but can't bring
myself to throw out! LOL!
Bob


  #65 (permalink)  
Old 17-01-2005, 09:09 PM
Bob
Usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Paul E. Lehmann" wrote
I believe some winemakers tend to "Over Science" winemaking.


You said a mouthful. I have a bag in my supply bucket just for all the
little bottles of this and that that I never ever use, but can't bring
myself to throw out! LOL!
Bob


 




Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
A Question about Home Wine Making and Alcohol Content. Daniel_B Winemaking 57 25-12-2004 03:38 AM
Cooking with wine ... RogerD Winemaking 0 30-09-2004 12:37 AM
ez caps Gregor Winemaking 14 13-07-2004 05:59 PM
Alcohol content Relaxification Beer 30 15-06-2004 05:53 PM
High Alcohol Content Beer Dan Iwerks Beer 9 11-06-2004 07:23 PM

fitness forum |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:47 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC6
Copyright ©2004-2008 FoodBanter.com, part of the NewsgroupBanter project.
The comments are property of their posters.
Buy PSP - Remortgaging - Loans - Online Loans - Credit Card