![]() |
|
Welcome to FoodBanter.com forums which provide access to the finest food and drink related newsgroups. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most newsgroup discussions and access our other FREE features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics to the food related newsgroups, communicate privately with other FoodBanter.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload your own photos and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact support. |
|
|||||||
| Winemaking (rec.crafts.winemaking) Discussion of the process, recipes, tips, techniques and general exchange of lore on the process, methods and history of wine making. Includes traditional grape wines, sparkling wines & champagnes. |
|
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
I have to agree that $150 for a bottle of Opus One is excessive. I do, on
the other hand, appreciate what they do considering the scale of their operation. In my opinion it is a very good $50-$75 bottle of wine. To balance the discussion, I believe Shafer does not practice extended maceration at all but then again, their best are in the barrel for two years and the bottle for one... To be honest, this whole discussion drives me crazy! I would really like to know what the best methods are for a given wine style but it seems that there are many more opinions than scienctific studies. I think it would be good for people on this newsgroup to do their own studies and report the findings to the group. From my own limited studies, the jury is still out on extended maceration but I have found the following methods beneficial: - Pump over w/ aeration + cap stirring (first pump over with venturi aeration, saturate cap and stir well) - ~100ppm Lysozyme immediately after crushing to inhibit wild ML bacteria (results in cleaner aromas in my studies) - Oak beans in primary fermentation (Medium to heavy toasted oak beans - seems to help stabilize color and gives VERY well integrated toasty aromas) It is a worthwhile study to determine what methods the very good to excellent producers are using consistently. While there are methods like EM that may just be a matter of stylistic choice and market positioning, there are other methods that perhaps should be included in a "core set of best practices" for high quality red winemaking. CHEERS! Aaron "JEP" wrote in message om... "Aaron Puhala" wrote in message .. . I should clarify. When I say upwards of 35-40 I am actually talking about maceration time which would include say 5-10 days for fermentation with actual EXTENDED maceration of 20-30 days. Some of the longest "macerators" that I am aware of a I like that term macerators. Somehow it has a nice ring to it :-) USA: Opus Mondavi Signorello Luna ABROAD: Artessa Arboleda / Caliterra Chateau Clinet Château Prieuré-Lichine Other Bordeaux (I believe extended maceration is traditional practice in Bordeaux) I'm still waiting for a list of the "very fine CA cabernets and blend producers". Sorry, that was a political statement better left un-said, but I couldn't resist. I have lost a lot of respect for Mondavi, especially since Tim Mondavi took over. IMHO, Opus is not and has never been worth the money they get. It was nothing more than a marketing scheme for the first "cult" wine from CA. Signorello and Luna I really don't know much about, but that also says something to me. Yes, I think Bordeaux probably pratices this more than most areas but they also have the fruit that requires it if they want to drink the wine near term. This allows some wine makers to produce what is refered to as "international" style wines (BTW, I don't like the term, personally). Early drinking, fruit forward but without the staying power of the more traditional styles. Bordeaux from the likes of Lafite, Latour, Mouton, etc. can be tannic monsters at release and require many years of aging to come into their own. If they use extended maceration, I'd hate to think what the wine is like before hand. Andy |
|
|||
|
To be honest, this whole discussion drives me crazy! I would really like to
know what the best methods are for a given wine style but it seems that there are many more opinions than scienctific studies. I think it would be good for people on this newsgroup to do their own studies and report the findings to the group. I agree! However, I think that most home winemakers simply don't go into that kind of scientific detail. Even to conduct simple experiments is a massive undertaking when considering the proper scientific method (controls, reproducibility, correct analysis, etc). If you really want to find the best methods then things get complicated because it depends on thorough understanding of the processes involved, the wine style (as you said), and the type and quality of fruit. Within these dependants is a minefield of issues. Pumping over with aeration and cap stirring may be successful for your fruit, but to really look at best methods in general requires looking at the fruit and wine style composition that that method was successful for. Still, there are some methods which seem to work more universally (e.g. the better integration from oak bean addition during fermentation rather than after which you mentioned). In addition to that, there are probably many ways to get to a similar place in winemaking. So I still agree. We can all do our small bit to further the general knowledge of best practises etc, and maybe as a collective whole the difference this makes will be considerable. Ultimately though, a "core set of best practices" is an ideal which may never be reached. (And anyway, wouldn't these be more likely to be about practises where there is less variation in methods between winemakers? Maceration regimes are a perfect example of something where there *is* a lot of variance.) I think it's one of the great things about winemaking that there are so many variables and therefore so much there's so much variety. Ben |
|
|||
|
"Aaron Puhala" wrote in message ... When you say they haven't been keeping well, what do you mean? When 1 to 2 years old they tend to be very fruity and nicely ballanced. After 2 years they start developing an off taste. I cannot specify what type of taste it is, just that it is not especially pleasant. It gets worse with time. I am not sure if it is something I have done, an infection that only shows up after 2 years, or what. Ray "Ray" wrote in message ... The last few years I have been trying to extend my maceration and waiting until the cap truly falls. I have been letting it go for 20+ days. I have been getting glorious color extraction and have been happy with the wines when young (18 mo's) but they have not been keeping well beyond 2-3 years. I wonder if this is because I left them too long. I have not been using inert gas but I have been laying a layer of sarane wrap over the surface to keep air contact to a minimum when the cap starts dropping. Like I say, no sign of oxidation when it becomes drinkable but it has not been keeping well. Just a comment. Any opinions would be welcome. Ray |
|
|||
|
Replying to several posts above:
Ben, I have used Lodi Merlot, Shiraz, and Cab Sauv. and Merlot, Cab. Franc, and Cab Sauv. from they east coast in different years. The wine does soften through maceration and I prefer softer reds. Beyond these comments, I am not sure. Brian: I punch down until the cap stops rising then I just check it every day not wanting to expose it too much. I may be getting to much air to it but oxidation has not been a problem up to an age of 2 years. Tom S.: Some of these wines have been high pH, high TA wines. For others the pH was about right. I only started checking SO2 levels recently and that may be a problem. But they do not seem to be oxidized. Ray "Ben Rotter" wrote in message om... Ray, when young (18 mo's) but they have not been keeping well beyond 2-3 years. I wonder if this is because I left them too long. Just a comment. Any opinions would be welcome. What quality of fruit are you using? What's your pH typically? I'm sure you know that without using fruit that can handle extended maceration (i.e. high quantity of ripe tannins, fruit character, etc) there's no point in EM. Have you noticed the wines' tannin profiles softening considerably during EM? Both the qualitative and quantitative qualities of phenols play a huge role in the success of EM. Ben |
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
"Paul E. Lehmann" wrote in message ...
Are they "Tannic Monsters" because of the grape or because they use a lot of new oak? I don't know, but I am curious. From the grapes. The use of a lot of new oak is more prevelant in California and Australia than it is in Bordeaux. Bordeaux tends to put a percentage of the wine in new oak and the rest in old oak. The percentage not only changes from house to house but from vintage to vintage at the same house, but 40%-60% is not uncommon. The only wines I know of that use 200% new oak come from the US (stress, "I know of"). And yes, that is 200%. They age for a year in new oak then transfer to another set of new barrels for additional aging. This isn't common, but it is done. Personally, I think they react to the grapes they get that year in Bordeaux more so than most California wine makers who want a consistant product from year to year. Of course they get a lot more variability in weather from year to year in Bordeaux, so it comes from necessity. Of course, these are all very broad generalities. There are many exceptions. Andy |
|
|||
|
As long as you have a tank of CO2, N2, or Ar, best to use your taste buds
every few days after cap fall since you can use your inert gas to protect the wine after each sampling. From my own experience with extended maceration, I suggest that you press the wine no more 2 weeks after cap fall. The riper your fruit, the longer you can go. There is a point after cap fall where the tannins soften substantially but the wine still has good backbone. It's more of a mid-pallate change where the wine feels smooth and full in the mouth but still has noticeable tannin after the wine is swallowed. Of course, to notice this change you need to be tasting the wine on a regular basis as cap fall approaches. As an aside - If anyone wants to see the benefits of extended maceration, try it with Sangiovese. I was floored myself by the difference aeration and EM makes with this variety. CHEERS! Aaron "Jim" wrote in message ... When fermentation is finished and the cap starts to fall is there an optimum time I should leave the wine before I press? I can cover the must with cellophane. |
|
|||
|
"Jim" wrote in message ... Thanks for the suggestions Aaron I do not have any gas, will cellophane do the job? A sheet of plastic, smoothed down against the surface of the wine and held down with flat pieces of wood will work. You could even just pour water on the top of the plastic to hold it in place, but you'd need to be careful not to get it into the wine. In either case, you want to spritz the edges lightly with sulfite to keep stuff from growing there, and wipe that area down when you check the wine. Tom S |
|
|||
|
Tom is right on. If you don't have inert gas to work with your number one
concern will be acetobacteria in the headspace. By keeping the plastic on tight (Before I purchased Argon tanks, I would cover with plastic and use duct tape around the perimeter) you will minimize the amount of oxygen and keep out bacteria sources (i.e. bugs and dust). Using sulfite as Tom suggests will kill surface bacteria. I prefer to use a clean cloth dampened with a strong sulfite/acid solution to wipe the inside sides and edges of the container rather than spray but either method should work just fine. During EM I taste my wines every few days starting about a week after cap fall. Opening the cover this often is not an issue for me as I have Argon to blanket after each tasting. You may want to limit your tasting to once at cap fall, at one week and again at 2 weeks. (I typically go between 15 and 20 days of EM) To minimize the number of times you open the cover, whenever you taste, make sure you will be able to press that day if need be. If you haven't done EM before, what you want to look for is a change in the mouthfeel of the wine. It will change from being obviously young and tannic in the mouth to being softer and more full. From my experience it is more a mid-pallate change as the tannins are still apparent after you swallow the wine. CHEERS and GOOD LUCK! Aaron "Tom S" wrote in message m... "Jim" wrote in message ... Thanks for the suggestions Aaron I do not have any gas, will cellophane do the job? A sheet of plastic, smoothed down against the surface of the wine and held down with flat pieces of wood will work. You could even just pour water on the top of the plastic to hold it in place, but you'd need to be careful not to get it into the wine. In either case, you want to spritz the edges lightly with sulfite to keep stuff from growing there, and wipe that area down when you check the wine. Tom S |
|
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Falling cheesecake | L. Raymond | General Cooking | 18 | 28-04-2004 09:31 AM |
| coconut cake falling | Kathy | Baking | 5 | 18-01-2004 05:59 PM |
| Kitchen towels with rack connection? | John White | Cooking Equipment | 43 | 12-12-2003 07:05 PM |
| Vegetarian Party Food (10) Collection | andy.mich | Recipes (moderated) | 0 | 18-10-2003 03:47 AM |