![]() |
|
Welcome to FoodBanter.com forums which provide access to the finest food and drink related newsgroups. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most newsgroup discussions and access our other FREE features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics to the food related newsgroups, communicate privately with other FoodBanter.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload your own photos and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact support. |
|
|||||||
| Winemaking (rec.crafts.winemaking) Discussion of the process, recipes, tips, techniques and general exchange of lore on the process, methods and history of wine making. Includes traditional grape wines, sparkling wines & champagnes. |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
We fermented some Merlot last year. It was fermented to "0" sg and it had a
good flavour. Some ws bottled, the rest left in a demi. Yhis year it is extremly smooth and tastes great except it is very sweet tasting. Any comments as to what went wrong? Thanks Bill |
|
|||
|
"bbbob" wrote:
We fermented some Merlot last year. It was fermented to "0" sg and it had a good flavour. Some ws bottled, the rest left in a demi. Yhis year it is extremly smooth and tastes great except it is very sweet tasting. Any comments as to what went wrong? Assuming you mean that the _same_ wine "had a good flavour" last year, and is now "very sweet": Also assuming that you mean an SG of 1.000 (an SG of 0 is impossible, although a Brix of 0 is a valid figure): Prior to fermentation, an SG of 1.000 would indicate the absence of any sugars. However, since the sugar in a must is converted to alcohol, which has an SG much lower than 1.000, a finished dry wine will have an SG around 0.990. Thus, your "finished" wine probably had considerable residual sugar, which you didn't notice earlier because of the pre-aging roughness. Either that, or the sugar fairy paid visit to your cellar. |
|
|||
|
Not necessarily true. If the fermentation stuck for some reason an SG of
1.000 is definitely in the realm of possible. Maybe there was too much sugar to begin with or not enough nutrient. If you are fairly new to winemaking and the young wine was harsh and maybe fairly acid you might think that it was dry when it had some residual sugar. Now that it has mellowed the sugar would come out more. Just a guess. Ray "Negodki" wrote in message ... "bbbob" wrote: We fermented some Merlot last year. It was fermented to "0" sg and it had a good flavour. Some ws bottled, the rest left in a demi. Yhis year it is extremly smooth and tastes great except it is very sweet tasting. Any comments as to what went wrong? Assuming you mean that the _same_ wine "had a good flavour" last year, and is now "very sweet": Also assuming that you mean an SG of 1.000 (an SG of 0 is impossible, although a Brix of 0 is a valid figure): Prior to fermentation, an SG of 1.000 would indicate the absence of any sugars. However, since the sugar in a must is converted to alcohol, which has an SG much lower than 1.000, a finished dry wine will have an SG around 0.990. Thus, your "finished" wine probably had considerable residual sugar, which you didn't notice earlier because of the pre-aging roughness. Either that, or the sugar fairy paid visit to your cellar. |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Austrian wine classifications (long) | winemonger | Wine | 4 | 06-06-2004 11:51 AM |
| International Wine Competition Ljubljana 50 years | Marjan Kveder | Wine | 0 | 10-05-2004 02:05 PM |
| Insanity of the wine industry | Vincent Vega | Wine | 333 | 27-04-2004 08:58 PM |
| Organic Wine Now | St. Matthew | Wine | 37 | 08-04-2004 02:23 AM |
| Hungarian Botryized Wine | Bromo | Wine | 10 | 16-01-2004 03:44 PM |