![]() |
|
Welcome to FoodBanter.com forums which provide access to the finest food and drink related newsgroups. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most newsgroup discussions and access our other FREE features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics to the food related newsgroups, communicate privately with other FoodBanter.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload your own photos and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact support. |
|
|||||||
| Winemaking (rec.crafts.winemaking) Discussion of the process, recipes, tips, techniques and general exchange of lore on the process, methods and history of wine making. Includes traditional grape wines, sparkling wines & champagnes. |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
Making a 6 gallon kit wine.
The first time racking from my primary to secondary didn't go as well as I had hoped. Got the sediment stirred up just enough to clog up the tube with a couple of oak chips. That slowed the racking down a lot. A nervous twitch of the arm pulled the hose out for a second, causing air to get into the system. The end result is I left behind a bit more wine than I hoped and got a bit more sediment into the secondary than I wanted. So I am wonder if this plan makes any sense. I will let the primary settle down for a couple of hours. Carefully pour off wine into a pitcher and pour that into the secondary. Then in the morning rack the secondary into another secondary. Then on with the show. Does this make any sense at all. I'm thinking the second racking will get eliminate sediment. I'll certainly leave some wine behind in the process. Will there be a net gain or loss of wine volume? Probably not a significant amount either way. Or should I just accept the fact that I have extra sediment and less wine and get on with the show? The kit directions indicate that I'll be racking twice more, so perhaps it's not a big deal. Your advice would be valuable! Dave |
|
|||
|
Hi Dave,
If you want a better yield, it's OK to use the pitcher to take off as much wine as possible. Next time you could try using a nylon jelly bag for the oak chips to keep them out of the tube. If you are planning to use the kit fining packs, DO NOT RE-RACK the bulk. Those packs are intended to work best when there is some sediment (called fine lees) to make nice big lumps that sit on the bottom when you rack later on. Tip from siphoning in chemistry lab: Put the bottom of the siphon tube about 6" into the wine. Drop it slowly as the level of wine goes down. You will disturb the bottom the very least possible this way. And if you start with the bottom on an inclined board, you will get maximum yield. --Irene (who has done all of this) "Dave" wrote in message ... Making a 6 gallon kit wine. The first time racking from my primary to secondary didn't go as well as I So I am wonder if this plan makes any sense. I will let the primary settle down for a couple of hours. Carefully pour off wine into a pitcher and pour that into the secondary. Then in the morning rack the secondary into another secondary. Then on with the show. Your advice would be valuable! Dave |
|
|||
|
Irene,
Thanks. That all makes sense. The most impressive thing is that you understood what I wrote. It was late and I'm from Boston ;-) Seems as though I'll have to work on my siphoning skills. Dave "Irene" wrote in message om... Hi Dave, If you want a better yield, it's OK to use the pitcher to take off as much wine as possible. Next time you could try using a nylon jelly bag for the oak chips to keep them out of the tube. If you are planning to use the kit fining packs, DO NOT RE-RACK the bulk. Those packs are intended to work best when there is some sediment (called fine lees) to make nice big lumps that sit on the bottom when you rack later on. Tip from siphoning in chemistry lab: Put the bottom of the siphon tube about 6" into the wine. Drop it slowly as the level of wine goes down. You will disturb the bottom the very least possible this way. And if you start with the bottom on an inclined board, you will get maximum yield. --Irene (who has done all of this) "Dave" wrote in message ... Making a 6 gallon kit wine. The first time racking from my primary to secondary didn't go as well as I So I am wonder if this plan makes any sense. I will let the primary settle down for a couple of hours. Carefully pour off wine into a pitcher and pour that into the secondary. Then in the morning rack the secondary into another secondary. Then on with the show. Your advice would be valuable! Dave |
|
|||
|
You can do that, I usually throw the light sediment in a bottle and
let it settle over night. I rack it in though. I rarely pour anything. I always try to keep things topped up completely (withing 1/2") once the wine has fermented completely. The pitcher idae seems a little open ended for my taste, but maybe cover it with Saran wrap if that is all you have. Regards, Joe "Dave" wrote in message ... Making a 6 gallon kit wine. The first time racking from my primary to secondary didn't go as well as I had hoped. Got the sediment stirred up just enough to clog up the tube with a couple of oak chips. That slowed the racking down a lot. A nervous twitch of the arm pulled the hose out for a second, causing air to get into the system. The end result is I left behind a bit more wine than I hoped and got a bit more sediment into the secondary than I wanted. So I am wonder if this plan makes any sense. I will let the primary settle down for a couple of hours. Carefully pour off wine into a pitcher and pour that into the secondary. Then in the morning rack the secondary into another secondary. Then on with the show. Does this make any sense at all. I'm thinking the second racking will get eliminate sediment. I'll certainly leave some wine behind in the process. Will there be a net gain or loss of wine volume? Probably not a significant amount either way. Or should I just accept the fact that I have extra sediment and less wine and get on with the show? The kit directions indicate that I'll be racking twice more, so perhaps it's not a big deal. Your advice would be valuable! Dave |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Rolling vs. racking | Scott Franz | Barbecue | 5 | 16-01-2004 11:30 AM |