Hi folks, I just harvested our concord grapes and want to try to make wine.
My wife has already canned many jars with half grape/half sugar water to
make sweetened juice.
My question is, can the juice she has already canned with the sugar water be
used to make wine?

According to one recipe, yeast should be added to the straight mash juice
and set for 3-4 weeks, until foam dissapates. (This would be straight juice
with no sugar. Sugar would be added later).

Does sugar content in juice affect the yeast action?

Thanks for your help!

Dave LaDouce

"LuckyDuke" wrote:
Hi folks, I just harvested our concord grapes and want to try to make
wine.
My wife has already canned many jars with half grape/half sugar water to
make sweetened juice.
My question is, can the juice she has already canned with the sugar water
be
used to make wine?

Yes, if she didn't add anything but sugar. However, the cooking will have
seriously affected the quality of the wine which you can make from the
juice. [It won't be as good as uncooked.] Also, if the added too much sugar,
you won't be able to ferment it either.

According to one recipe, yeast should be added to the straight mash juice
and set for 3-4 weeks, until foam dissapates. (This would be straight
juice
with no sugar. Sugar would be added later).

That would work, but would if the sugar content were low, the wine would be
low in alcohol, and wouldn't keep very well. Conversely, if the sugar
content were high, you might not be able to start the ferment, or the wine
might end up to alcoholic.

Bread yeast will not ferment to more than about 9%, and it won't eve start
in a high-sugar juice. You need a good wine yeast for wine.

Does sugar content in juice affect the yeast action?

Yes. The more sugar, the more alcohol --- theoretically. However, if there
is too much sugar initially, the yeast may die immediately, or they may
convert some of the sugar to alcohol, and then die because of the high
alcohol environment. Generally, one wants 20-24% sugar initially.

In article ,
"Negodki" wrote:

Yes, if she didn't add anything but sugar. However, the cooking will have
seriously affected the quality of the wine which you can make from the
juice. [It won't be as good as uncooked.] Also, if the added too much sugar,
you won't be able to ferment it either.

I would tend to disagree with this statement --- cooked fruits are
certainly different in flavor from fresh fruits, but I would not say
they are worse ---- Just different.

--
Greg Cook
http://homepage.mac.com/gregcook/Wine

(remove spamblocker from my email address)

"Negodki" wrote:

Yes, if she didn't add anything but sugar. However, the cooking will
have
seriously affected the quality of the wine which you can make from the
juice. [It won't be as good as uncooked.] Also, if she added too much
sugar,
you won't be able to ferment it either.

"Greg Cook" wrote:

I would tend to disagree with this statement --- cooked fruits are
certainly different in flavor from fresh fruits, but I would not say
they are worse ---- Just different.

Cooked (or pasteurized) GRAPE wine (which is what we are discussing) is
definitely inferior to uncooked wine, all other factors being equal. Cooking
destroys essential flavour and "mouth-feel" ingredients. I suspect the same
is true of other fruits as well.

In article ,
"Negodki" wrote:

"Negodki" wrote:

Yes, if she didn't add anything but sugar. However, the cooking will
have
seriously affected the quality of the wine which you can make from the
juice. [It won't be as good as uncooked.] Also, if she added too much
sugar,
you won't be able to ferment it either.

"Greg Cook" wrote:

I would tend to disagree with this statement --- cooked fruits are
certainly different in flavor from fresh fruits, but I would not say
they are worse ---- Just different.

Cooked (or pasteurized) GRAPE wine (which is what we are discussing) is
definitely inferior to uncooked wine, all other factors being equal. Cooking
destroys essential flavour and "mouth-feel" ingredients. I suspect the same
is true of other fruits as well.



Again, in my opinion, I do not believe cooked fruits are always inferior
-- they are just different. Grape jelly is a cooked product, as is any
fruit jelly and I think they have a lot of fruit flavor. One day a
friend of mine brought over a delightfully fruity raspberry wine with a
terrific mouth feel. He surprised the hell out of me when he said he
made it from raspberry jam. Most of the better cherry wines I have
tasted have been made from cooked cherries -- even pie filling makes a
delightful cherry wine.

--
Greg Cook
http://homepage.mac.com/gregcook/Wine

(remove spamblocker from my email address)

Negodki wrote:
Cooked (or pasteurized) GRAPE wine (which is what we were discussing) is
definitely inferior to uncooked wine, all other factors being equal.
Cooking
destroys essential flavour and "mouth-feel" ingredients. I suspect the
same
is true of other fruits as well.

"Greg Cook" wrote:
Again, in my opinion, I do not believe cooked fruits are always inferior
-- they are just different. Grape jelly is a cooked product, as is any
fruit jelly and I think they have a lot of fruit flavor. One day a
friend of mine brought over a delightfully fruity raspberry wine with a
terrific mouth feel. He surprised the hell out of me when he said he
made it from raspberry jam. Most of the better cherry wines I have
tasted have been made from cooked cherries -- even pie filling makes a
delightful cherry wine.

Cooked grape juice makes a wonderful grape jelly. But grape jelly is NOT the
flavour most people expect from a wine.

And raw potatoes taste like, well, raw potatoes. Cooked potatoes make a much
better dish.

I didn't say one can't make a good wine from cooked fruit (I make very good
wine from pasteurized grape juice and canned cherries), but that it is
inferior to a good wine made from fresh fruit (assuming the fresh fruit is
edible in its uncooked state).

If you've ever compared a St. Emilion with a pasteurized bottle, you'll
instantly see what I mean.