A Food and drink forum. FoodBanter.com

Welcome to FoodBanter.com forums which provide access to the finest food and drink related newsgroups.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most newsgroup discussions and access our other FREE features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics to the food related newsgroups, communicate privately with other FoodBanter.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload your own photos and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact support.

Go Back   Home » FoodBanter.com forum » Drinking » Winemaking
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Winemaking (rec.crafts.winemaking) Discussion of the process, recipes, tips, techniques and general exchange of lore on the process, methods and history of wine making. Includes traditional grape wines, sparkling wines & champagnes.

low SG



 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 13-03-2008, 02:40 PM posted to rec.crafts.winemaking
thekanes
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 4
Default low SG

I am making a red wine kit.
I have followed the kit instructions to the letter.
After stabilisation my SG is only 0.900, not the 0.098 - 1.005 described in
the instructions.
Is this good or bad and can it be fixed??

--
Michael
Dartmouth, Nova Scotia


  #2 (permalink)  
Old 13-03-2008, 03:43 PM posted to rec.crafts.winemaking
frederick ploegman
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 108
Default low SG

Take another reading. That number doesn't make sense.


"thekanes" wrote in message
news:81bCj.86136$w57.85276@edtnps90...
I am making a red wine kit.
I have followed the kit instructions to the letter.
After stabilisation my SG is only 0.900, not the 0.098 - 1.005 described
in the instructions.
Is this good or bad and can it be fixed??

--
Michael
Dartmouth, Nova Scotia



  #3 (permalink)  
Old 13-03-2008, 03:54 PM posted to rec.crafts.winemaking
thekanes
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 4
Default low SG

0.900 is the reading

--
Michael and Ileen Kane
Dartmouth, Nova Scotia
"thekanes" wrote in message
news:81bCj.86136$w57.85276@edtnps90...
I am making a red wine kit.
I have followed the kit instructions to the letter.
After stabilisation my SG is only 0.900, not the 0.098 - 1.005 described
in the instructions.
Is this good or bad and can it be fixed??

--
Michael
Dartmouth, Nova Scotia



  #4 (permalink)  
Old 13-03-2008, 04:03 PM posted to rec.crafts.winemaking
thekanes
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 4
Default low SG

after secondary fermentation, the wine settled at 0.900 for 2 days, so I
stabilised.
It stayed at just over 0.900

--
Michael and Ileen Kane
Dartmouth, Nova Scotia
"thekanes" wrote in message
news:a7cCj.86173$w57.71199@edtnps90...
0.900 is the reading

--
Michael and Ileen Kane
Dartmouth, Nova Scotia
"thekanes" wrote in message
news:81bCj.86136$w57.85276@edtnps90...
I am making a red wine kit.
I have followed the kit instructions to the letter.
After stabilisation my SG is only 0.900, not the 0.098 - 1.005 described
in the instructions.
Is this good or bad and can it be fixed??

--
Michael
Dartmouth, Nova Scotia





  #5 (permalink)  
Old 13-03-2008, 04:37 PM posted to rec.crafts.winemaking
pp
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 300
Default low SG

On Mar 13, 9:03*am, "thekanes" wrote:
after secondary fermentation, the wine settled at 0.900 for 2 days, so I
stabilised.
It stayed at just over 0.900

--
Michael and Ileen Kane
Dartmouth, Nova Scotia"thekanes" wrote in message

news:a7cCj.86173$w57.71199@edtnps90...



0.900 is the reading


--
Michael and Ileen Kane
Dartmouth, Nova Scotia
"thekanes" wrote in message
news:81bCj.86136$w57.85276@edtnps90...
I am making a red wine kit.
I have followed the kit instructions to the letter.
After stabilisation my SG is only 0.900, *not the 0.098 - 1.005 described
in the instructions.
Is this good or bad and can it be fixed??


--
Michael
Dartmouth, Nova Scotia- Hide quoted text -


- Show quoted text -


Look at your hydrometer scale again, I think it says 0.990, not 0.900.
Kit instructions often say to stabilized at 0.998 or lower. 0.990 is
good for a red kit because it means the wine is fully dry.

Pp
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 13-03-2008, 05:11 PM posted to rec.crafts.winemaking
thekanes
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 4
Default low SG

OK OK - I guess it is 0.990, whatever is just above the 1 on the scale.
The kit calls for 0.998 - 1.005, so it is still out of the range and tastes
very dry.

Should I add sugar and stabilizer just before I bottle??

--
Michael and Ileen Kane
Dartmouth, Nova Scotia
"pp" wrote in message
...
On Mar 13, 9:03 am, "thekanes" wrote:
after secondary fermentation, the wine settled at 0.900 for 2 days, so I
stabilised.
It stayed at just over 0.900

--
Michael and Ileen Kane
Dartmouth, Nova Scotia"thekanes" wrote in
message

news:a7cCj.86173$w57.71199@edtnps90...



0.900 is the reading


--
Michael and Ileen Kane
Dartmouth, Nova Scotia
"thekanes" wrote in message
news:81bCj.86136$w57.85276@edtnps90...
I am making a red wine kit.
I have followed the kit instructions to the letter.
After stabilisation my SG is only 0.900, not the 0.098 - 1.005
described
in the instructions.
Is this good or bad and can it be fixed??


--
Michael
Dartmouth, Nova Scotia- Hide quoted text -


- Show quoted text -


Look at your hydrometer scale again, I think it says 0.990, not 0.900.
Kit instructions often say to stabilized at 0.998 or lower. 0.990 is
good for a red kit because it means the wine is fully dry.

Pp


  #7 (permalink)  
Old 13-03-2008, 08:24 PM posted to rec.crafts.winemaking
greg@testengineering.info
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 96
Default low SG

On Mar 13, 10:11*am, "thekanes" wrote:
OK OK - I guess it is 0.990, whatever is just above the 1 on the scale.
The kit calls for 0.998 - 1.005, so it is still out of the range and tastes
very dry.

Should I add sugar and stabilizer just before I bottle??


0.990 makes a lot more sense... I don't even think 0.900 is possible.

Regardless of the reading and the kit instructions, if you like it,
leave it alone. If it's too dry, sweeten carefully. If you add sugar
too quickly, it can cause an eruption like Mount Vesuvius. If you add
too much sugar, there's no easy way to make it less sweet. If you do
choose to sweeten it, make sure it's stable before you bottle. The
best way to do this is to allow it to bulk age for a few months. If
there's no sign of life after that, you can safely bottle it.

Greg


  #8 (permalink)  
Old 13-03-2008, 08:29 PM posted to rec.crafts.winemaking
Doug[_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 64
Default low SG

The point of checking the SG is to be reasonably certain that
fermentation has stopped. If you're below the target SG, and the wine
is no longer bubbling, then fermentation is finished, which is good.

At this point (as the instructions should tell you) you should be
adding the clarifying agent(s). Most kits also have you add sorbate
as a precaution, in case there is any residual sugar. What I don't
understand is why you would want to add sugar before you bottle. If
this is a dry red kit, why not leave it dry?

If you are going to sweeten it, then you definitely need to add the
sorbate, to prevent renewed fermentation. If you are going to leave
the wine dry, the sorbate is optional. It shouldn't hurt, but you
shouldn't need it, based on your SG readings. In any case, don't be
in a rush to bottle it. Particularly if you do sweeten the wine, give
it a few days to adjust and settle before bottling.

Doug
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 16-03-2008, 11:26 AM posted to rec.crafts.winemaking
A. J. Rawls
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 26
Default low SG

On Thu, 13 Mar 2008 14:40:04 GMT, "thekanes"
wrote:

I am making a red wine kit.
I have followed the kit instructions to the letter.
After stabilisation my SG is only 0.900, not the 0.098 - 1.005 described in
the instructions.
Is this good or bad and can it be fixed??


What kind of kit are you making?
The Anchorage Fishwrapper and Litterbox Liner Press
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 17-03-2008, 01:15 AM posted to rec.crafts.winemaking
Dave Allison
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 124
Default low SG

hahahaha. That was funny. No help, but funny. hahaha. DAve

A. J. Rawls wrote:
On Thu, 13 Mar 2008 14:40:04 GMT, "thekanes"
wrote:

I am making a red wine kit.
I have followed the kit instructions to the letter.
After stabilisation my SG is only 0.900, not the 0.098 - 1.005 described in
the instructions.
Is this good or bad and can it be fixed??


What kind of kit are you making?
The Anchorage Fishwrapper and Litterbox Liner Press

  #11 (permalink)  
Old 17-03-2008, 09:39 AM posted to rec.crafts.winemaking
Joe Sallustio
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 831
Default low SG

On Mar 13, 10:40 am, "thekanes" wrote:
I am making a red wine kit.
I have followed the kit instructions to the letter.
After stabilisation my SG is only 0.900, not the 0.098 - 1.005 described in
the instructions.
Is this good or bad and can it be fixed??

--
Michael
Dartmouth, Nova Scotia


Michael,
I think you are reading your hydrometer wrong to begin with. If this
is an inexpensive hydrometer it is graduated in 0.002 S.G.
increments. the first line above the 1.000 mark is 1.002, the first
below is 0.998 below, meaning toward the bottom or base.


Joe
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 17-03-2008, 11:28 PM posted to rec.crafts.winemaking
Steve[_6_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 137
Default low SG

Michael:

I think youwould benefit the most from visiting your local Home Brew
Shop and having somebody explain the hydrometer to you.

Steve

On Mon, 17 Mar 2008 02:39:37 -0700 (PDT), Joe Sallustio
wrote:

On Mar 13, 10:40 am, "thekanes" wrote:
I am making a red wine kit.
I have followed the kit instructions to the letter.
After stabilisation my SG is only 0.900, not the 0.098 - 1.005 described in
the instructions.
Is this good or bad and can it be fixed??

--
Michael
Dartmouth, Nova Scotia


Michael,
I think you are reading your hydrometer wrong to begin with. If this
is an inexpensive hydrometer it is graduated in 0.002 S.G.
increments. the first line above the 1.000 mark is 1.002, the first
below is 0.998 below, meaning toward the bottom or base.


Joe


 




Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


fitness forum |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:09 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC6
Copyright ©2004-2008 FoodBanter.com, part of the NewsgroupBanter project.
The comments are property of their posters.
Cardcaptor Sakura Episodes - Personal Loans - Personal Loan - Remortgages - Loans