![]() |
|
Welcome to FoodBanter.com forums which provide access to the finest food and drink related newsgroups. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most newsgroup discussions and access our other FREE features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics to the food related newsgroups, communicate privately with other FoodBanter.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload your own photos and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact support. |
|
|||||||
| Winemaking (rec.crafts.winemaking) Discussion of the process, recipes, tips, techniques and general exchange of lore on the process, methods and history of wine making. Includes traditional grape wines, sparkling wines & champagnes. |
|
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
On Dec 19, 11:25 pm, Dick Heckman wrote:
It seems that there is much less activity here lately. Are folks moving elsewhere? dick If they are anything like me Dick, it's the Christmas preparations, finishing off work etc. Also with less fruit coming into season I guess less wine is being made and less questions being asked therefore. I did wonder myself though... Jim |
|
|||
|
I check in every day - but don't have much need to start threads this
time of year; last year's grapes are now aging into wine in the cellar, the vines are all dormant, and there isn't really much going on in the winery. A little prep for some spring bottling, but that's about it. Meanwhile - enjoying the wines from '05 and '06 right now! On 2007-12-19 15:25:39 -0800, Dick Heckman said: It seems that there is much less activity here lately. Are folks moving elsewhere? dick |
|
|||
|
Dick Heckman wrote:
It seems that there is much less activity here lately. Are folks moving elsewhere? I'm going to FL, USA for the Christmas Holiday. Did a second racking of '07 Zin/Alicante last week - about 80 gals. Bottled 12 cases of '06 Shiraz/Zin/Alicante blend on Monday. Transferred 120L of '07 into French Oak. Bringing down some '03 Cab/Zin,'04 Cab/Zin/Carignane,'05 Cab/Zin, and '06 Zin/Alicante for my 86 year old Dad for Christmas. Steve |
|
|||
|
On Dec 19, 6:25 pm, Dick Heckman wrote:
It seems that there is much less activity here lately. Are folks moving elsewhere? dick This is the original winemaking newsgroup, it's been around for close to 15 years. To be honest, it's not only spawned a lot of other groups but most questions have been asked and answered many times. The groups was much more active years ago, but that is where a lot of questions got answered. I might be willing to bet there are close to a thousand posts on cleaning/ removing labels from bottles for example. There really aren't that many ways to do that and I can guarantee all of them have already been explored here. I'm not saying it's outlived it's usefulness, just that there are other groups out there now answering all these questions, again. So 'dilution' is occurring... ![]() Joe |
|
|||
|
On Dec 20, 4:46*am, Joe Sallustio wrote:
On Dec 19, 6:25 pm, Dick Heckman wrote: It seems that there is much less activity here lately. *Are folks moving elsewhere? dick This is the original winemaking newsgroup, it's been around for close to 15 years. *To be honest, it's not only spawned a lot of other groups but most questions have been asked and answered many times. The groups was much more active years ago, but that is where a lot of questions got answered. *I might be willing to bet there are close to a thousand posts on cleaning/ removing labels from bottles for example. *There really aren't that many ways to do that and I can guarantee all of them have already been explored here. I'm not saying it's outlived it's usefulness, just that there are other groups out there now answering all these questions, again. *So 'dilution' is occurring... * ![]() Joe I agree with Joe. You can search almost any wine making question within this group and you will find pages of relative info. I search first and if I don't find the info/help I need, then I will post a question. Why post if the info you need has been discussed multiple times. I think some of the folks that have been around this site for awhile probably get tired of the same old questions all the time. That said, this is a great group and a wealth of information and if you don't like to search and would rather post questions, I bet you will still get some discussion. Happy Holidays! Jesse |
|
|||
|
Exactly, People have learned how to do searches. I assume that is the
reason also. It's very rare a "new" question is posted and just as rare that a "new" answer will be given. Bob On Dec 27, 5:41*pm, wrote: On Dec 20, 4:46*am, Joe Sallustio wrote: On Dec 19, 6:25 pm, Dick Heckman wrote: It seems that there is much less activity here lately. *Are folks moving elsewhere? dick This is the original winemaking newsgroup, it's been around for close to 15 years. *To be honest, it's not only spawned a lot of other groups but most questions have been asked and answered many times. The groups was much more active years ago, but that is where a lot of questions got answered. *I might be willing to bet there are close to a thousand posts on cleaning/ removing labels from bottles for example. *There really aren't that many ways to do that and I can guarantee all of them have already been explored here. I'm not saying it's outlived it's usefulness, just that there are other groups out there now answering all these questions, again. *So 'dilution' is occurring... * ![]() Joe I agree with Joe. You can search almost any wine making question within this group and you will find pages of relative info. I search first and if I don't find the info/help I need, then I will post a question. Why post if the info you need has been discussed multiple times. I think some of the folks that have been around this site for awhile probably get tired of the same old questions all the time. That said, this is a great group and a wealth of information and if you don't like to search and would rather post questions, I bet you will still get some discussion. Happy Holidays! Jesse |
|
|||
|
On Dec 27, 10:45 pm, wrote:
Exactly, People have learned how to do searches. I assume that is the reason also. It's very rare a "new" question is posted and just as rare that a "new" answer will be given. Bob On Dec 27, 5:41 pm, wrote: On Dec 20, 4:46 am, Joe Sallustio wrote: On Dec 19, 6:25 pm, Dick Heckman wrote: It seems that there is much less activity here lately. Are folks moving elsewhere? dick This is the original winemaking newsgroup, it's been around for close to 15 years. To be honest, it's not only spawned a lot of other groups but most questions have been asked and answered many times. The groups was much more active years ago, but that is where a lot of questions got answered. I might be willing to bet there are close to a thousand posts on cleaning/ removing labels from bottles for example. There really aren't that many ways to do that and I can guarantee all of them have already been explored here. I'm not saying it's outlived it's usefulness, just that there are other groups out there now answering all these questions, again. So 'dilution' is occurring... ![]() Joe I agree with Joe. You can search almost any wine making question within this group and you will find pages of relative info. I search first and if I don't find the info/help I need, then I will post a question. Why post if the info you need has been discussed multiple times. I think some of the folks that have been around this site for awhile probably get tired of the same old questions all the time. That said, this is a great group and a wealth of information and if you don't like to search and would rather post questions, I bet you will still get some discussion. Happy Holidays! Jesse I kind of agree and kind of don't. Many people use the news-reader portion of outlook express. Unless their newsgroup provider has unlimited retention and was there before the start of this wine-making group they wouldn't be able to find the messages in their news-client. They might not realise (as I didn't till the middle of this year) that they could search the entire (I think) archive on Google. Also, different practices and materials and equipment arises from time to time, so it is on occasion worth revisiting. I agree in general though ![]() |
|
|||
|
On Dec 27, 9:55*pm, jim wrote:
On Dec 27, 10:45 pm, wrote: Exactly, People have learned how to do searches. I assume that is the reason also. *It's very rare a "new" question is posted and just as rare that a "new" answer will be given. Bob On Dec 27, 5:41 pm, wrote: On Dec 20, 4:46 am, Joe Sallustio wrote: On Dec 19, 6:25 pm, Dick Heckman wrote: It seems that there is much less activity here lately. *Are folks moving elsewhere? dick This is the original winemaking newsgroup, it's been around for close to 15 years. *To be honest, it's not only spawned a lot of other groups but most questions have been asked and answered many times. The groups was much more active years ago, but that is where a lot of questions got answered. *I might be willing to bet there are close to a thousand posts on cleaning/ removing labels from bottles for example. *There really aren't that many ways to do that and I can guarantee all of them have already been explored here. I'm not saying it's outlived it's usefulness, just that there are other groups out there now answering all these questions, again. *So 'dilution' is occurring... * ![]() Joe I agree with Joe. You can search almost any wine making question within this group and you will find pages of relative info. I search first and if I don't find the info/help I need, then I will post a question. Why post if the info you need has been discussed multiple times. I think some of the folks that have been around this site for awhile probably get tired of the same old questions all the time. That said, this is a great group and a wealth of information and if you don't like to search and would rather post questions, I bet you will still get some discussion. Happy Holidays! Jesse I kind of agree and kind of don't. Many people use the news-reader portion of outlook express. *Unless their newsgroup provider has unlimited retention and was there before the start of this wine-making group they wouldn't be able to find the messages in their news-client. *They might not realise (as I didn't till the middle of this year) that they could search the entire (I think) archive on Google. *Also, different practices and materials and equipment arises from time to time, so it is on occasion worth revisiting. I agree in general though - Hide quoted text -- Show quoted text - Oh yeah, you can get the original posts from when they started the group in Usenet back in 1993 on Google's archives. I probably have at least 50 books on wine and winemaking but probably learned more here on this group. You can never beat first hand experience. Google is amazing, you can read 100 year old winemaking books now if you want to... Joe |
|
|||
|
Joe Sallustio wrote:
On Dec 27, 9:55 pm, jim wrote: On Dec 27, 10:45 pm, wrote: Exactly, People have learned how to do searches. I assume that is the reason also. It's very rare a "new" question is posted and just as rare that a "new" answer will be given. Bob On Dec 27, 5:41 pm, wrote: On Dec 20, 4:46 am, Joe Sallustio wrote: On Dec 19, 6:25 pm, Dick Heckman wrote: It seems that there is much less activity here lately. Are folks moving elsewhere? dick This is the original winemaking newsgroup, it's been around for close to 15 years. To be honest, it's not only spawned a lot of other groups but most questions have been asked and answered many times. The groups was much more active years ago, but that is where a lot of questions got answered. I might be willing to bet there are close to a thousand posts on cleaning/ removing labels from bottles for example. There really aren't that many ways to do that and I can guarantee all of them have already been explored here. I'm not saying it's outlived it's usefulness, just that there are other groups out there now answering all these questions, again. So 'dilution' is occurring... ![]() Joe I agree with Joe. You can search almost any wine making question within this group and you will find pages of relative info. I search first and if I don't find the info/help I need, then I will post a question. Why post if the info you need has been discussed multiple times. I think some of the folks that have been around this site for awhile probably get tired of the same old questions all the time. That said, this is a great group and a wealth of information and if you don't like to search and would rather post questions, I bet you will still get some discussion. Happy Holidays! Jesse I kind of agree and kind of don't. Many people use the news-reader portion of outlook express. Unless their newsgroup provider has unlimited retention and was there before the start of this wine-making group they wouldn't be able to find the messages in their news-client. They might not realise (as I didn't till the middle of this year) that they could search the entire (I think) archive on Google. Also, different practices and materials and equipment arises from time to time, so it is on occasion worth revisiting. I agree in general though - Hide quoted text -- Show quoted text - Oh yeah, you can get the original posts from when they started the group in Usenet back in 1993 on Google's archives. I probably have at least 50 books on wine and winemaking but probably learned more here on this group. You can never beat first hand experience. Google is amazing, you can read 100 year old winemaking books now if you want to... Joe I've just noticed that in the last year the post volume seemed to drop pretty drastically. I've been lurking most of the time for quite a few years and copying posts that I found valuable. I'm not all that computer literate and never thought to search google. I just like to see what folks are thinking about wine and winemaking from time to time. I've made fruit wines when the fruit was available and I felt like it for about 30 yrs. I've never worried about recipes etc other than making sure I had a reasonable SG at start and a decent wine yeast. I've never had a real failure. I've planted a few vines now and in a couple of years maybe I'll have some grape wines. The frost in the Southeast last spring knocked my vines in a cocked hat and I'm almost starting over. Thanks, Dick |
|
|||
|
"Dick Heckman" wrote in message ... Joe Sallustio wrote: On Dec 27, 9:55 pm, jim wrote: On Dec 27, 10:45 pm, wrote: Exactly, People have learned how to do searches. I assume that is the reason also. It's very rare a "new" question is posted and just as rare that a "new" answer will be given. Bob On Dec 27, 5:41 pm, wrote: On Dec 20, 4:46 am, Joe Sallustio wrote: On Dec 19, 6:25 pm, Dick Heckman wrote: It seems that there is much less activity here lately. Are folks moving elsewhere? dick This is the original winemaking newsgroup, it's been around for close to 15 years. To be honest, it's not only spawned a lot of other groups but most questions have been asked and answered many times. The groups was much more active years ago, but that is where a lot of questions got answered. I might be willing to bet there are close to a thousand posts on cleaning/ removing labels from bottles for example. There really aren't that many ways to do that and I can guarantee all of them have already been explored here. I'm not saying it's outlived it's usefulness, just that there are other groups out there now answering all these questions, again. So 'dilution' is occurring... ![]() Joe I agree with Joe. You can search almost any wine making question within this group and you will find pages of relative info. I search first and if I don't find the info/help I need, then I will post a question. Why post if the info you need has been discussed multiple times. I think some of the folks that have been around this site for awhile probably get tired of the same old questions all the time. That said, this is a great group and a wealth of information and if you don't like to search and would rather post questions, I bet you will still get some discussion. Happy Holidays! Jesse I kind of agree and kind of don't. Many people use the news-reader portion of outlook express. Unless their newsgroup provider has unlimited retention and was there before the start of this wine-making group they wouldn't be able to find the messages in their news-client. They might not realise (as I didn't till the middle of this year) that they could search the entire (I think) archive on Google. Also, different practices and materials and equipment arises from time to time, so it is on occasion worth revisiting. I agree in general though - Hide quoted text -- Show quoted text - Oh yeah, you can get the original posts from when they started the group in Usenet back in 1993 on Google's archives. I probably have at least 50 books on wine and winemaking but probably learned more here on this group. You can never beat first hand experience. Google is amazing, you can read 100 year old winemaking books now if you want to... Joe I've just noticed that in the last year the post volume seemed to drop pretty drastically. I've been lurking most of the time for quite a few years and copying posts that I found valuable. I'm not all that computer literate and never thought to search google. I just like to see what folks are thinking about wine and winemaking from time to time. I've made fruit wines when the fruit was available and I felt like it for about 30 yrs. I've never worried about recipes etc other than making sure I had a reasonable SG at start and a decent wine yeast. I've never had a real failure. I've planted a few vines now and in a couple of years maybe I'll have some grape wines. The frost in the Southeast last spring knocked my vines in a cocked hat and I'm almost starting over. Thanks, Dick It's the newbies that keep this group going. All too often lately, they are being told to "go get googled". Some interpret this as the equivalent of "go get F***** ", and they take their questions to friendlier places. I, for one, would like to see the use of google as an answer be outlawed in this group !! (personal opinion of one grouchy old fart) |
|
|||
|
Dick Heckman wrote:
Joe Sallustio wrote: On Dec 27, 9:55 pm, jim wrote: On Dec 27, 10:45 pm, wrote: Exactly, People have learned how to do searches. I assume that is the reason also. It's very rare a "new" question is posted and just as rare that a "new" answer will be given. Bob On Dec 27, 5:41 pm, wrote: On Dec 20, 4:46 am, Joe Sallustio wrote: On Dec 19, 6:25 pm, Dick Heckman wrote: It seems that there is much less activity here lately. Are folks moving elsewhere? dick This is the original winemaking newsgroup, it's been around for close to 15 years. To be honest, it's not only spawned a lot of other groups but most questions have been asked and answered many times. The groups was much more active years ago, but that is where a lot of questions got answered. I might be willing to bet there are close to a thousand posts on cleaning/ removing labels from bottles for example. There really aren't that many ways to do that and I can guarantee all of them have already been explored here. I'm not saying it's outlived it's usefulness, just that there are other groups out there now answering all these questions, again. So 'dilution' is occurring... ![]() Joe I agree with Joe. You can search almost any wine making question within this group and you will find pages of relative info. I search first and if I don't find the info/help I need, then I will post a question. Why post if the info you need has been discussed multiple times. I think some of the folks that have been around this site for awhile probably get tired of the same old questions all the time. That said, this is a great group and a wealth of information and if you don't like to search and would rather post questions, I bet you will still get some discussion. Happy Holidays! Jesse I kind of agree and kind of don't. Many people use the news-reader portion of outlook express. Unless their newsgroup provider has unlimited retention and was there before the start of this wine-making group they wouldn't be able to find the messages in their news-client. They might not realise (as I didn't till the middle of this year) that they could search the entire (I think) archive on Google. Also, different practices and materials and equipment arises from time to time, so it is on occasion worth revisiting. I agree in general though - Hide quoted text- - Show quoted text - Oh yeah, you can get the original posts from when they started the group in Usenet back in 1993 on Google's archives. I probably have at least 50 books on wine and winemaking but probably learned more here on this group. You can never beat first hand experience. Google is amazing, you can read 100 year old winemaking books now if you want to... Joe I've just noticed that in the last year the post volume seemed to drop pretty drastically. I've been lurking most of the time for quite a few years and copying posts that I found valuable. I'm not all that computer literate and never thought to search google. I just like to see what folks are thinking about wine and winemaking from time to time. I've made fruit wines when the fruit was available and I felt like it for about 30 yrs. I've never worried about recipes etc other than making sure I had a reasonable SG at start and a decent wine yeast. I've never had a real failure. I've planted a few vines now and in a couple of years maybe I'll have some grape wines. The frost in the Southeast last spring knocked my vines in a cocked hat and I'm almost starting over. Thanks, Dick Hang in there Dick. I lost 90% of my fruiting buds during the Easter week freezes but this was a first time happening for me. The other vineyards around here fared much better and it was a vintage year. I think I am in my own little micro climate (on a slope near a ravine) Growing grapes can be very rewarding as well as very frustrating at times but once the bug hits you, you will enjoy. |
|
|||
|
frederick ploegman wrote:
"Dick Heckman" wrote in message ... Joe Sallustio wrote: On Dec 27, 9:55 pm, jim wrote: On Dec 27, 10:45 pm, wrote: Exactly, People have learned how to do searches. I assume that is the reason also. It's very rare a "new" question is posted and just as rare that a "new" answer will be given. Bob On Dec 27, 5:41 pm, wrote: On Dec 20, 4:46 am, Joe Sallustio wrote: On Dec 19, 6:25 pm, Dick Heckman wrote: It seems that there is much less activity here lately. Are folks moving elsewhere? dick This is the original winemaking newsgroup, it's been around for close to 15 years. To be honest, it's not only spawned a lot of other groups but most questions have been asked and answered many times. The groups was much more active years ago, but that is where a lot of questions got answered. I might be willing to bet there are close to a thousand posts on cleaning/ removing labels from bottles for example. There really aren't that many ways to do that and I can guarantee all of them have already been explored here. I'm not saying it's outlived it's usefulness, just that there are other groups out there now answering all these questions, again. So 'dilution' is occurring... ![]() Joe I agree with Joe. You can search almost any wine making question within this group and you will find pages of relative info. I search first and if I don't find the info/help I need, then I will post a question. Why post if the info you need has been discussed multiple times. I think some of the folks that have been around this site for awhile probably get tired of the same old questions all the time. That said, this is a great group and a wealth of information and if you don't like to search and would rather post questions, I bet you will still get some discussion. Happy Holidays! Jesse I kind of agree and kind of don't. Many people use the news-reader portion of outlook express. Unless their newsgroup provider has unlimited retention and was there before the start of this wine-making group they wouldn't be able to find the messages in their news-client. They might not realise (as I didn't till the middle of this year) that they could search the entire (I think) archive on Google. Also, different practices and materials and equipment arises from time to time, so it is on occasion worth revisiting. I agree in general though - Hide quotedtext - - Show quoted text - Oh yeah, you can get the original posts from when they started the group in Usenet back in 1993 on Google's archives. I probably have at least 50 books on wine and winemaking but probably learned more here on this group. You can never beat first hand experience. Google is amazing, you can read 100 year old winemaking books now if you want to... Joe I've just noticed that in the last year the post volume seemed to drop pretty drastically. I've been lurking most of the time for quite a few years and copying posts that I found valuable. I'm not all that computer literate and never thought to search google. I just like to see what folks are thinking about wine and winemaking from time to time. I've made fruit wines when the fruit was available and I felt like it for about 30 yrs. I've never worried about recipes etc other than making sure I had a reasonable SG at start and a decent wine yeast. I've never had a real failure. I've planted a few vines now and in a couple of years maybe I'll have some grape wines. The frost in the Southeast last spring knocked my vines in a cocked hat and I'm almost starting over. Thanks, Dick It's the newbies that keep this group going. All too often lately, they are being told to "go get googled". Some interpret this as the equivalent of "go get F***** ", and they take their questions to friendlier places. I, for one, would like to see the use of google as an answer be outlawed in this group !! (personal opinion of one grouchy old fart) I AGREE 100% One of the nice things about this news group is that there are those of us out here will answer questions - even though it has been asked many times before. I hope we NEVER become like some of the other newsgroups with answers like "Read the FAQs" or "Google it". Sometimes the answer to an old question can be such that it leads to new understandings or brings up issues that a plain "Search Google" does not reveal. For those who find it irritating to see repeated questions the answer is simple - just don't read them or reply. |
|
|||
|
OTOH pointing a fellow to an endless wealth of information is no small
aid IMO. In fact one could argued more helpful than a quick one shot answer. That might leave the helper feeling good about their deed, but certainly the helpee is nowhere as educated than if directed to the wealth of info available to them. In additon to Lum's book and Keller's site: http://www.geocities.com/lumeisenman/ http://winemaking.jackkeller.net/ there's 2 amazing FAQ's one for wine making: http://paranoia.lycaeum.org/alcohol/winemaking-faq and one for grape growing: http://vitfaq.vinic.com/gohome.html And last but not leat the Advanced Seach feature for Usenet: http://groups.google.com/advanced_se...e=UTF-8&hl=en& Here is the accumulated knowledge of rcw, with detail knowledge and EXPERIENCE in the specific and esoteric as well as detailed answers for entry level and novice wine maker. Frankly I think providing these resources to a novice is much more valuable than the usual 'buy a kit and follow directions' advice. Who's really dismissing the noobie here? Steve Oregon On Mon, 31 Dec 2007 09:17:26 -0500, "Paul E. Lehmann" wrote: frederick ploegman wrote: It's the newbies that keep this group going. All too often lately, they are being told to "go get googled". Some interpret this as the equivalent of "go get F***** ", and they take their questions to friendlier places. I, for one, would like to see the use of google as an answer be outlawed in this group !! (personal opinion of one grouchy old fart) I AGREE 100% One of the nice things about this news group is that there are those of us out here will answer questions - even though it has been asked many times before. I hope we NEVER become like some of the other newsgroups with answers like "Read the FAQs" or "Google it". Sometimes the answer to an old question can be such that it leads to new understandings or brings up issues that a plain "Search Google" does not reveal. For those who find it irritating to see repeated questions the answer is simple - just don't read them or reply. |
|
|||
|
I agree Steve but I don't think anyone is dismissing anyone else.
There are always several ways to skin a cat and dismissing one over the other is where the danger is. I know exactly what both points of view are trying to say. As long as "newbies" don't take a link as FU, I'm sure we'll all be fine. That's what links are for. To save typing it in again. If the "newbie" takes it as if I typed the whole thing myself ( plagerizing it) then all will be fine.OTOH, if I type a short answer and the newbie doesn't think I have time for him or he doesn't interpret my short answer as FU then we'll be fine too. I'm more of the type where I'd rather someone give me the whole enchillada and let me peruse it at my own leisure. Then if I still have questions about the details I won't feel shy about asking them. Bob On Dec 31, 1:18*pm, spud wrote: OTOH pointing a fellow to an endless wealth of information is no small aid IMO. *In fact one could argued more helpful than a quick one shot answer. *That might leave the helper feeling good about their deed, but certainly the helpee is nowhere as educated than if directed to the wealth of info available to them. * * In additon to Lum's book and Keller's site: *http://www.geocities.com/lumeisenman...ackkeller.net/ there's 2 amazing FAQ's one for wine making:http://paranoia.lycaeum.org/alcohol/winemaking-faq and one for grape growing:http://vitfaq.vinic.com/gohome.html And last but not leat the Advanced Seach feature for Usenet:http://groups.google.com/advanced_se...e=UTF-8&hl=en& Here is the accumulated knowledge of rcw, with detail knowledge and EXPERIENCE in the specific and esoteric as well as detailed answers for entry level and novice wine maker. * Frankly I think providing these resources to a novice is much more valuable than the usual 'buy a kit and follow directions' advice. Who's really dismissing the noobie here? Steve Oregon On Mon, 31 Dec 2007 09:17:26 -0500, "Paul E. Lehmann" wrote: frederick ploegman wrote: It's the newbies that keep this group going. All too often lately, they are being told to "go get googled". *Some interpret this as the equivalent of "go get F***** ", and they take their questions to friendlier places. *I, for one, would like to see the use of google as an answer be outlawed in this group !! *(personal opinion of one grouchy old fart) I AGREE 100% One of the nice things about this news group is that there are those of us out here will answer questions - even though it has been asked many times before. *I hope we NEVER become like some of the other newsgroups with answers like "Read the FAQs" or "Google it". *Sometimes the answer to an old question can be such that it leads to new understandings or brings up issues that a plain "Search Google" does not reveal. *For those who find it irritating to see repeated questions the answer is simple - just don't read them or reply. |