A Food and drink forum. FoodBanter.com

Welcome to FoodBanter.com forums which provide access to the finest food and drink related newsgroups.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most newsgroup discussions and access our other FREE features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics to the food related newsgroups, communicate privately with other FoodBanter.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload your own photos and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact support.

Go Back   Home » FoodBanter.com forum » Drinking » Winemaking
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Winemaking (rec.crafts.winemaking) Discussion of the process, recipes, tips, techniques and general exchange of lore on the process, methods and history of wine making. Includes traditional grape wines, sparkling wines & champagnes.

q2 - leaving behind the pulp



 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 18-12-2007, 12:52 PM posted to rec.crafts.winemaking
Jeff
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 11
Default q2 - leaving behind the pulp


For reasons I can't even explain, I made a sugar beet wine. To make
it, I had to cook the sugar beets and then to maximize the sugar
extraction (I didn't add any) I decided to run the cooked beets
through a blender. The result was 5.5 gallons of liquid that is the
consistency of loose apple sauce.

To that, I aerated and hit it with pectic enzyme and some yeast, and
let it go. It's about a week in, and amazingly, it really hasn't
settled much. There is so much pulp, that it's still to the top.

I have no idea exactly how much sugar was in it because 1) my
hydrometer was broken and 2) I don't think you could have measured it
with all that pulp. It was pretty sweet though.

So, it's been a week now, and fermentation is slowing down. Any
suggestions on how to leave the pulp behind and get it to secondary
without losing a ton of liquid? I'm concerned about oxidation too. On
this batch, I have not used any sulfite yet - not sure if I should
bother at this point. I really can't think of a way to do this without
introducing a ton of oxygen.

Thanks,
--Jeff
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 19-12-2007, 01:55 AM posted to rec.crafts.winemaking
bobdrob
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 109
Default q2 - leaving behind the pulp

I've had great success transfering the must into nylon hops bags. I use
Brute barrels as small batch primaries, so, I got some 1/2" dowling at home
despot; cut it to straddle the primary w/ an inch overhang on each side.
Then, I took a belt sander & flattened each end of the dowel to sit on the
primary rim. Tie the hop bag to the dowel so that it doesn't touch the must
surface; hang and let it drain this way for a couple days, primary covered
of course. The hop bags are machine washable & reusable. I tried pantyhose
(new ;^) ) but found that it stretched & dipped into the must, being
somewhat self-defeating... HTH, regards, bob
"Jeff" wrote in message
...

For reasons I can't even explain, I made a sugar beet wine. To make
it, I had to cook the sugar beets and then to maximize the sugar
extraction (I didn't add any) I decided to run the cooked beets
through a blender. The result was 5.5 gallons of liquid that is the
consistency of loose apple sauce.

To that, I aerated and hit it with pectic enzyme and some yeast, and
let it go. It's about a week in, and amazingly, it really hasn't
settled much. There is so much pulp, that it's still to the top.

I have no idea exactly how much sugar was in it because 1) my
hydrometer was broken and 2) I don't think you could have measured it
with all that pulp. It was pretty sweet though.

So, it's been a week now, and fermentation is slowing down. Any
suggestions on how to leave the pulp behind and get it to secondary
without losing a ton of liquid? I'm concerned about oxidation too. On
this batch, I have not used any sulfite yet - not sure if I should
bother at this point. I really can't think of a way to do this without
introducing a ton of oxygen.

Thanks,
--Jeff



 




Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


fitness forum |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:29 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC6
Copyright ©2004-2008 FoodBanter.com, part of the NewsgroupBanter project.
The comments are property of their posters.
Music Lyrics - Homeowner Loans - Mortgages - eHarmony Coupon - Loans