A Food and drink forum. FoodBanter.com

Welcome to FoodBanter.com forums which provide access to the finest food and drink related newsgroups.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most newsgroup discussions and access our other FREE features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics to the food related newsgroups, communicate privately with other FoodBanter.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload your own photos and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact support.

Go Back   Home » FoodBanter.com forum » Drinking » Winemaking
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Winemaking (rec.crafts.winemaking) Discussion of the process, recipes, tips, techniques and general exchange of lore on the process, methods and history of wine making. Includes traditional grape wines, sparkling wines & champagnes.

Question about technique for pH testing



 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 23-09-2007, 02:27 PM posted to rec.crafts.winemaking
Lee[_11_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 15
Default Question about technique for pH testing

My question concerns how reliable pH testing is, in the setting of an
active fermentation.

Last week, I started with several crates of fresh red grapes. The
initial chemistries were poor...the pH was in the 3.9 to 4.0 range,
and the TA was as low as 0.40. Everytime I "under-adjust", I end up
with flabby though inoffensive wine. This time, I figured that I'd
give it a significant dose of tartaric (about 2.5 g/liter of must). I
plan to cold stabilize as well as do an MLF.

But I'm concerned that I may have overdone it. When I test the pH
now, at the top of the carboy with active fermentation going on, the
pH is in the 3.2 range. I'd like to be in the 3.4-3.5 range.

My question is whether these measurements are accurate. Does the
significant amount of CO2 that's obviously at the top of the carboy
affect pH measurements?

Has anyone had any experience with carbonate additions?

Thanks in advance,

Lee

  #2 (permalink)  
Old 23-09-2007, 03:26 PM posted to rec.crafts.winemaking
Paul E. Lehmann
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 272
Default Question about technique for pH testing

Lee wrote:

My question concerns how reliable pH testing is,
in the setting of an active fermentation.

Last week, I started with several crates of
fresh red grapes. The initial chemistries were
poor...the pH was in the 3.9 to 4.0 range,
and the TA was as low as 0.40. Everytime I
"under-adjust", I end up
with flabby though inoffensive wine. This time,
I figured that I'd
give it a significant dose of tartaric (about
2.5 g/liter of must). I plan to cold stabilize
as well as do an MLF.

But I'm concerned that I may have overdone it.
When I test the pH now, at the top of the carboy
with active fermentation going on, the
pH is in the 3.2 range. I'd like to be in the
3.4-3.5 range.

My question is whether these measurements are
accurate. Does the significant amount of CO2
that's obviously at the top of the carboy affect
pH measurements?

Has anyone had any experience with carbonate
additions?

Thanks in advance,

Lee


I don't see how the amount of tartaric you added
could have lowered the pH that much. You might
try removing a test size sample of the wine and
allow to set for awhile, recalibrate your pH
meter and re-test.
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 23-09-2007, 04:11 PM posted to rec.crafts.winemaking
Lee[_11_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 15
Default Question about technique for pH testing

On Sep 23, 10:26?am, "Paul E. Lehmann" wrote:
Lee wrote:
My question concerns how reliable pH testing is,
in the setting of an active fermentation.


Last week, I started with several crates of
fresh red grapes. The initial chemistries were
poor...the pH was in the 3.9 to 4.0 range,
and the TA was as low as 0.40. Everytime I
"under-adjust", I end up
with flabby though inoffensive wine. This time,
I figured that I'd
give it a significant dose of tartaric (about
2.5 g/liter of must). I plan to cold stabilize
as well as do an MLF.


But I'm concerned that I may have overdone it.
When I test the pH now, at the top of the carboy
with active fermentation going on, the
pH is in the 3.2 range. I'd like to be in the
3.4-3.5 range.


My question is whether these measurements are
accurate. Does the significant amount of CO2
that's obviously at the top of the carboy affect
pH measurements?


Has anyone had any experience with carbonate
additions?


Thanks in advance,


Lee


I don't see how the amount of tartaric you added
could have lowered the pH that much. You might
try removing a test size sample of the wine and
allow to set for awhile, recalibrate your pH
meter and re-test.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -


When I first tested the must after adding the acid, it tested
3.38-3.40, which I was happy with. It tasted acidic. But the only
reason I can think of that the pH rose that much was because of all of
the dissolved CO2. I seem to remember that one should heat up a
sample before testing, to drive off the CO2.

  #4 (permalink)  
Old 24-09-2007, 05:41 PM posted to rec.crafts.winemaking
pp
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 307
Default Question about technique for pH testing

On Sep 23, 8:11 am, Lee wrote:
On Sep 23, 10:26?am, "Paul E. Lehmann" wrote:





Lee wrote:
My question concerns how reliable pH testing is,
in the setting of an active fermentation.


Last week, I started with several crates of
fresh red grapes. The initial chemistries were
poor...the pH was in the 3.9 to 4.0 range,
and the TA was as low as 0.40. Everytime I
"under-adjust", I end up
with flabby though inoffensive wine. This time,
I figured that I'd
give it a significant dose of tartaric (about
2.5 g/liter of must). I plan to cold stabilize
as well as do an MLF.


But I'm concerned that I may have overdone it.
When I test the pH now, at the top of the carboy
with active fermentation going on, the
pH is in the 3.2 range. I'd like to be in the
3.4-3.5 range.


My question is whether these measurements are
accurate. Does the significant amount of CO2
that's obviously at the top of the carboy affect
pH measurements?


Has anyone had any experience with carbonate
additions?


Thanks in advance,


Lee


I don't see how the amount of tartaric you added
could have lowered the pH that much. You might
try removing a test size sample of the wine and
allow to set for awhile, recalibrate your pH
meter and re-test.- Hide quoted text -


- Show quoted text -


When I first tested the must after adding the acid, it tested
3.38-3.40, which I was happy with. It tasted acidic. But the only
reason I can think of that the pH rose that much was because of all of
the dissolved CO2. I seem to remember that one should heat up a
sample before testing, to drive off the CO2.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -


This was discussed in the past so you might want to search the archive
for more details. From what I remember, pH should not be affected
(much), TA is. The heat treatment is needed for measuring TA. But you
can always do this and measure the pH as well to take one variable
out.

I agree with Paul that the drop is too big. Normally the pH tends to
go up doing the ferment as potassium from the skins gets extracted
into the juice. So it does seem strange it'd go from 3.4 to 3.2.

Finally, you can't really do much at this point anw, so perhaps the
best option is just to wait, do the ML, naybe cold stabilize and see
where you end up. You can always take out some acid chemically if
necessary but the wine will probably be fine.

We always tend worry a lot about our "babies" when they're taking
their first steps; they're usually turn out just fine on their own...

Pp

  #5 (permalink)  
Old 25-09-2007, 02:00 AM posted to rec.crafts.winemaking
Joe Sallustio
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 858
Default Question about technique for pH testing

On Sep 24, 12:41 pm, pp wrote:
On Sep 23, 8:11 am, Lee wrote:





On Sep 23, 10:26?am, "Paul E. Lehmann" wrote:


Lee wrote:
My question concerns how reliable pH testing is,
in the setting of an active fermentation.


Last week, I started with several crates of
fresh red grapes. The initial chemistries were
poor...the pH was in the 3.9 to 4.0 range,
and the TA was as low as 0.40. Everytime I
"under-adjust", I end up
with flabby though inoffensive wine. This time,
I figured that I'd
give it a significant dose of tartaric (about
2.5 g/liter of must). I plan to cold stabilize
as well as do an MLF.


But I'm concerned that I may have overdone it.
When I test the pH now, at the top of the carboy
with active fermentation going on, the
pH is in the 3.2 range. I'd like to be in the
3.4-3.5 range.


My question is whether these measurements are
accurate. Does the significant amount of CO2
that's obviously at the top of the carboy affect
pH measurements?


Has anyone had any experience with carbonate
additions?


Thanks in advance,


Lee


I don't see how the amount of tartaric you added
could have lowered the pH that much. You might
try removing a test size sample of the wine and
allow to set for awhile, recalibrate your pH
meter and re-test.- Hide quoted text -


- Show quoted text -


When I first tested the must after adding the acid, it tested
3.38-3.40, which I was happy with. It tasted acidic. But the only
reason I can think of that the pH rose that much was because of all of
the dissolved CO2. I seem to remember that one should heat up a
sample before testing, to drive off the CO2.- Hide quoted text -


- Show quoted text -


This was discussed in the past so you might want to search the archive
for more details. From what I remember, pH should not be affected
(much), TA is. The heat treatment is needed for measuring TA. But you
can always do this and measure the pH as well to take one variable
out.

I agree with Paul that the drop is too big. Normally the pH tends to
go up doing the ferment as potassium from the skins gets extracted
into the juice. So it does seem strange it'd go from 3.4 to 3.2.

Finally, you can't really do much at this point anw, so perhaps the
best option is just to wait, do the ML, naybe cold stabilize and see
where you end up. You can always take out some acid chemically if
necessary but the wine will probably be fine.

We always tend worry a lot about our "babies" when they're taking
their first steps; they're usually turn out just fine on their own...

Pp- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -


Great advice, wait it out is what I would do too.. From what I have
read, pH is not affected by CO2 but that seems silly; I always take 50
ml of sample, bring it to a boil in a microwave, let it cool, add
distilled water to bring the value up to 50 ml again. I need to do
that for TA anyways so just use that sample for pH too. pH can go
down due to fermentation, other acids are formed.

Joe

 




Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


fitness forum |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:47 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC6
Copyright ©2004-2008 FoodBanter.com, part of the NewsgroupBanter project.
The comments are property of their posters.
Mortgages - Mobile Phone - Xbox Mod Chip - Mortgage Calculator - Mortgages