![]() |
|
Welcome to FoodBanter.com forums which provide access to the finest food and drink related newsgroups. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most newsgroup discussions and access our other FREE features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics to the food related newsgroups, communicate privately with other FoodBanter.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload your own photos and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact support. |
|
|||||||
| Wine (alt.food.wine) Devoted to the discussion of wine and wine-related topics. A place to read and comment about wines, wine and food matching, storage systems, wine paraphernalia, etc. In general, any topic related to wine is valid fodder for the group. |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
Hello everybody,
as I am rather underwhelmed with some Piemontese wines that I left in the cellar for about a 6 years, I wonder if other contributors to this NG share my impression. Among those wines tasted recently, there was Barbaresco 1997 Coparossa, Bruno Rocca (RP 90+ points, drink now-2013) Barolo Vigna del Gris 1997, Conterno Fantino (RP 93 points, 2004-2020, tre bicchieri in Gambero Rosso) Not that those wines were flawed, they were just unexciting and especially the Barolo had a bit too much (volatile?) acidity for my palate. IMHO cellaring of many Italian wines - esp. Tuscany and Veneto - is a very worthwile exercise, so I am a bit intrigued by the Piemontese. Or am I just expecting too much? Thanks for sharing your impressions with me Yves |
|
|||
|
The wines you had are reliable wines but made under "modern" conditions,
less time on the skins, smaller cooperage, more fining & filtering. This style was pioneered by Ratti, Vietti, Aldo Conterno, Ceretto in the early 1980's. At 7 years a traditionally made barolo/barbaresco would become approachable, a modern styled wine should be at its peak. Tannic wines go through stages whether they be from Bordeaux or Piedmont. Some people refer a wine that shows little as being in a "dumb" stage. Italian wines in general have more VA then those from elsewhere. Some of Quintarelli's wines from Verona virtually jumped out of the bottles in the 80's--ie the corks were pushed out. Going from Italy to another country in tasting emphasizes the disparity in the amount of VA. If you do not like that level of VA ask your merchant for some with less VA or move on. Please note that the Dan Quayle Society has objected to the indiscriminate use of the word "dumb" as have several groups involved with hearing problems and loss of body functions. Using that word it was not my purpose to demean anyone. I understand the Association of Wine Writers has commissioned a study in conjunction with the Department of Defense to review words like "dumb" and "smart"(as in smart bombs). The NEA has objected to this study on an ipso facto premise. More later.......... "Yves" wrote in message ... Hello everybody, as I am rather underwhelmed with some Piemontese wines that I left in the cellar for about a 6 years, I wonder if other contributors to this NG share my impression. Among those wines tasted recently, there was Barbaresco 1997 Coparossa, Bruno Rocca (RP 90+ points, drink now-2013) Barolo Vigna del Gris 1997, Conterno Fantino (RP 93 points, 2004-2020, tre bicchieri in Gambero Rosso) Not that those wines were flawed, they were just unexciting and especially the Barolo had a bit too much (volatile?) acidity for my palate. IMHO cellaring of many Italian wines - esp. Tuscany and Veneto - is a very worthwile exercise, so I am a bit intrigued by the Piemontese. Or am I just expecting too much? Thanks for sharing your impressions with me Yves |