![]() |
|
Welcome to FoodBanter.com forums which provide access to the finest food and drink related newsgroups. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most newsgroup discussions and access our other FREE features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics to the food related newsgroups, communicate privately with other FoodBanter.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload your own photos and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact support. |
|
|||||||
| Wine (alt.food.wine) Devoted to the discussion of wine and wine-related topics. A place to read and comment about wines, wine and food matching, storage systems, wine paraphernalia, etc. In general, any topic related to wine is valid fodder for the group. |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
Saturday was some supposed Alaska king salmon on the grill. I was a
little sceptical of $7 king, but it actually was delicious. Sides were corn, eggplant, and salad. Wine was the 2001 Domaine Drouhin Pinot Noir. Lovely example of Oregon Pinot, ripe red and black fruit with some tannins that need a little time to integrate. As it aerates, the black cherry fruit develops secondary aromas of earth and a little coffee. Good stuff with bright balanced acidity, my guess is will get better. Day 2 the tannins were still there, the acidity less apparent, the fruit even riper. B+/A- Sunday Betsy did duck legs. The Pinot was ok with it (usually PN/Burg is my go-to duck), but better was a 2001 Ogier "La Rosine" VdP des Collines Rhodaniennes (the ducks had mustard under the panko; the Syrah seemed to deal with the spiciness better). Nice fruity Syrah with a firm acidic backbone and light tannins, the dark (blackberry and black raspberry) fruit had a meaty note than could have almost passed for a C-R. Not THAT serious a wine, but a swell bottle for the midteens. B+ Tonight we had a quiet Labor Day, Betsy made a veal ragu from a Biba Caggiano recipe. I went to the cellar for a Tuscan Sangiovese, yet emerged with a 2004 Pepiere Cuvee Granit (Vin de Pays du Jardin de France). This wine (I'm pretty sure I remember from earlier vintages it's Cab Franc and Gamay, from the Muscadet area) had good acidity and prickly fruit. The tannins seemed surprisingly noticable for a CF/Gamay blend, but not harsh. Bitter cherry fruit, with a funny earthy note I can't pin down. Some kind of gardening smell- potting soil or some lawn treatment. I ask Betsy (the gardener) , she guesses "Roundup." Hmm, she's joking, but I think she doesn't like this. I like it ok, give it a B, we'll see what it's like day 2. Grade disclaimer: I'm a very easy grader, basically A is an excellent wine, B a good wine, C mediocre. Anything below C means I wouldn't drink at a party where it was only choice. Furthermore, I offer no promises of objectivity, accuracy, and certainly not of consistency |
|
|||
|
Ok, so I unexpectedly had to spend last night driving in the city, so
didn't have any wine with dinner (too bad, lobster salad that calls out for Chardonnay). But at 1:30 when I got home I had a glass of the Pepiere to unwind. Meantime I learned that I was wrong about the cepage, it is apparently Cab Franc, Cab Sauvignon, and maybe some Cot (Malbec). The funny thing is now that I've been told there's no Gamay, it was now tasting more Gamay-like. A little more grapey/sweet cherry rather than bitter cherry, and much less tannic than day 2. There's still that earthy/potting soil note, but less prominent than last night. A slight improvement over Day 1's dinner. Decent QPR, but not the screaming deal of the Pepiere regular Muscadet, or the Briords. |