![]() |
|
Welcome to FoodBanter.com forums which provide access to the finest food and drink related newsgroups. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most newsgroup discussions and access our other FREE features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics to the food related newsgroups, communicate privately with other FoodBanter.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload your own photos and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact support. |
|
|||||||
| Wine (alt.food.wine) Devoted to the discussion of wine and wine-related topics. A place to read and comment about wines, wine and food matching, storage systems, wine paraphernalia, etc. In general, any topic related to wine is valid fodder for the group. |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
Just back from a Caribbean cruise on MSC Opera (Italian line) the wine list
was predominately Italian so I took a chance on a couple of previous unkowns described in the wine list as: Pinot Nero Vinificato Rosso doc Vigna Rasara "Il Montu" (2001?) a very nice wine not a great one, but certainly pleasant enough that we drank two bottles ;-). Butafucco Roccolo delle Viole OP (a town, full name escapes) Nice light fruity with no great qualities, a good wine, but not a great one. Barbera d'Asti doc La Coumaleja I really liked this one figure it to be a $10-12 US bottle of wine but a good QPR at that point. Actually would have bought more if it hadn't been the last night when I tried it. One I didn't try was Motefalco "Colpetrone" the wine guy didn't really want to push it, but somehow I think it should have been at least as good as the Buttafucco does anyone know? Oh yes, we did have a 98 Bunello "Marchesato degli Alleramici" and it was a very nice experience, too bad I was drinking and not writing! |
|
|||
|
jcoulter wrote:
[cut] One I didn't try was Motefalco "Colpetrone" the wine guy didn't really want to push it, but somehow I think it should have been at least as good as the Buttafucco does anyone know? Buttafuoco and Sagrantino are quite different wines. One (buttafuoco) is made in Oltre Po Pavese (Lombardia, north od Italy). Sagrantino is produced in Umbria, near Assisi (Umbria, in the centre of Italy). Montefalco "Colpetrone" maybe was "Sagrantino di Montefalco" by Colpetrone? If it is so, you missed a great red wine, richly colored, fully structured and ageworthy wine. taken from: http://www.selectedestates.com/scacciadiavoli.html [Scacciadiavoli is another Sagrantino producer, but the matter does not change] " What makes Sagrantino such a unique and highly promising wine grape are its extraordinary and practically unrivalled content of total polyphenols (anthocyanins and tannins), which make Sagrantino-based wines some of the fullest-bodied, deepest-flavored and longest-lived red wines of all. The variety tends to easily accumulate sugar grapes. Measurements of 22 to 23 Babo (close to 14,5/15 degrees of potential alcohol by volume) are not uncommon. Skins are so high in polyphenols that 4.000 to 5.000 mg./lt. are normal for grape. To give but a proof of Sagrantino's awesome raw power as wine grape, it's worth reminding that the minimum dry extract required by law for Sagrantino di Montefalco Secco Doc is as high 26 gr./lt., and that oftentimes Sagrantino di Montefalco wines attain a level of dry extract as high 40-45 gr./lt. ! (it suffices to note that as an acclaimed and full-bodied wine as Chateau Margaux 1986 carried a "mere" 32 gr./lt. of dry extract). Given such tremendous level of concentration, makes sense that in the old times Sagrantino was vinified off-dry, to let a slight residual sugar balance the powerful grip of tannins on the back palate. " Also, in Italy when you speak about "Sagrantino", the first brand name is "Arnaldo Caprai". my 2 cents -- Giorgio68 |
|
|||
|
Giorgio68 wrote in
: jcoulter wrote: [cut] One I didn't try was Motefalco "Colpetrone" the wine guy didn't really want to push it, but somehow I think it should have been at least as good as the Buttafucco does anyone know? Buttafuoco and Sagrantino are quite different wines. One (buttafuoco) is made in Oltre Po Pavese (Lombardia, north od Italy). Sagrantino is produced in Umbria, near Assisi (Umbria, in the centre of Italy). Montefalco "Colpetrone" maybe was "Sagrantino di Montefalco" by Colpetrone? Well the note did say Umbria. So why didn't I take you along to help me choose? ;-) Thank you for the reply. |
|
|||
|
jcoulter wrote:
[cut] Well the note did say Umbria. So why didn't I take you along to help me choose? ;-) Next time, go to the internet point and ask ![]() (here or in the italian wine newsgroup, named it.hobby.vino) Thank you for the reply. You are welcome Ciao! -- Giorgio68 |
|
|||
|
"Giorgio68" wrote in message ... Skins are so high in polyphenols that 4.000 to 5.000 mg./lt. are normal for grape. To give but a proof of Sagrantino's awesome raw power as wine grape, it's worth reminding that the minimum dry extract required by law for Sagrantino di Montefalco Secco Doc is as high 26 gr./lt., and that oftentimes Sagrantino di Montefalco wines attain a level of dry extract as high 40-45 gr./lt. ! (it suffices to note that as an acclaimed and full-bodied wine as Chateau Margaux 1986 carried a "mere" 32 gr./lt. of dry extract). Hi, Giorgio - I'm a little confused by these numbers. 4 to 5 mg./liter polyphenols sounds reasonable, but 40-45 gr./liter of "dry extract"? What's that? Please define "dry extract". If it's dissolved solids, I would assume that number includes tartaric acid, but that rarely exceeds 10 gr./liter (except, perhaps, in a German white wine). Even 26 gr./liter sounds like a lot of dissolved solids for a wine to contain - especially a dry wine. So what's all the rest of the dissolved solids? Tom S |
|
|||
|
Tom S wrote:
"Giorgio68" wrote in message ... Skins are so high in polyphenols that 4.000 to 5.000 mg./lt. are normal for grape. To give but a proof of Sagrantino's awesome raw power as wine grape, it's worth reminding that the minimum dry extract required by law for Sagrantino di Montefalco Secco Doc is as high 26 gr./lt., and that oftentimes Sagrantino di Montefalco wines attain a level of dry extract as high 40-45 gr./lt. ! (it suffices to note that as an acclaimed and full-bodied wine as Chateau Margaux 1986 carried a "mere" 32 gr./lt. of dry extract). Hi, Giorgio - I'm a little confused by these numbers. 4 to 5 mg./liter polyphenols sounds reasonable, but 40-45 gr./liter of "dry extract"? What's that? Please define "dry extract". Hi Tom, with "dry extract" we refer to the solid compounds in wine, such as sugars, acids and tannins. The whole that remain after a 180°C heating. If it's dissolved solids, I would assume that number includes tartaric acid, but that rarely exceeds 10 gr./liter (except, perhaps, in a German white wine). It is so. Even 26 gr./liter sounds like a lot of dissolved solids for a wine to contain - especially a dry wine. So what's all the rest of the dissolved solids? Tom, the best answer to you is to try to taste a glass of Sagrantino. In Italy we say "possente", so we can translate it as "powerful". For instance, from the web site of a winemaker like Arnaldo Caprai we get, for the Sagrantino 25: http://snipurl.com/crl7 ANALYTICAL DATA - 2000 vintage °Alcohol: 14.5 Vol Total Acid.:5.3 g/l Final pH:3.65 Phenolics:4200 mg/l Extract:35,4 (total) However, I am not able to give you more datails about the specific of the rest ![]() my 2 cents -- Giorgio68 |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Misc. Notes | Bill Spohn | Wine | 0 | 15-07-2004 03:34 PM |
| Misc. Wines this week | Bill Spohn | Wine | 2 | 29-06-2004 06:23 AM |
| TN: Two inexpensive Italians | Dale Williams | Wine | 5 | 01-06-2004 12:06 AM |
| Misc. Notes | Bill Spohn | Wine | 0 | 25-01-2004 03:50 PM |
| TN of new Italians | Wine | 0 | 31-12-2003 03:32 PM | |