![]() |
|
Welcome to FoodBanter.com forums which provide access to the finest food and drink related newsgroups. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most newsgroup discussions and access our other FREE features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics to the food related newsgroups, communicate privately with other FoodBanter.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload your own photos and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact support. |
|
|||||||
| Wine (alt.food.wine) Devoted to the discussion of wine and wine-related topics. A place to read and comment about wines, wine and food matching, storage systems, wine paraphernalia, etc. In general, any topic related to wine is valid fodder for the group. |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
Tonight, Jean and I -- in conjunction with Dale and Betsy -- decided to
open the first bottle of a recent auction purchase split between Dale and myself. To add some extra fun, we decided to open the same bottle the same night to compare notes. Jean and I opened ours 15 minutes before a dinner of roast (Amish) chicken, roasted fingerling potatoes and sautéed asparagus with morels (the asparagus was always followed by chicken or potato prior to any wine). What follows are my notes, made without consultation of Dale's own notes: 1970 Ducru-Beaucaillou fill: top shoulder color: orange at the rim, going to dark garnet at the center nose: dark fruit, pencil lead, a hint of violets, later taking on a more herbal quality palate: medium body, vibrant dark fruit, good acidity, soft tannins remaining Incredibly primary for a 38-year old Bordeaux, it seemed to emphasize the flavors of Cabernet Sauvignon. Lovely, but not tremendously complex, this wine was shockingly young-seeming and in great shape. A definite 4 on the Hoare food/wine matching scale. One minor point of contention emerged about 3/4 way through this bottle: I felt that it had begun to smell of low-level cork taint, but Jean (who claims to be as sensitive as me to TCA) vehemently denied that. Who knows? Mark Lipton |
|
|||
|
On May 12, 9:24 pm, Mark Lipton wrote:
Tonight, Jean and I -- in conjunction with Dale and Betsy -- decided to open the first bottle of a recent auction purchase split between Dale and myself. To add some extra fun, we decided to open the same bottle the same night to compare notes. Jean and I opened ours 15 minutes before a dinner of roast (Amish) chicken, roasted fingerling potatoes and sautéed asparagus with morels (the asparagus was always followed by chicken or potato prior to any wine). What follows are my notes, made without consultation of Dale's own notes: 1970 Ducru-Beaucaillou fill: top shoulder color: orange at the rim, going to dark garnet at the center nose: dark fruit, pencil lead, a hint of violets, later taking on a more herbal quality palate: medium body, vibrant dark fruit, good acidity, soft tannins remaining Incredibly primary for a 38-year old Bordeaux, it seemed to emphasize the flavors of Cabernet Sauvignon. Lovely, but not tremendously complex, this wine was shockingly young-seeming and in great shape. A definite 4 on the Hoare food/wine matching scale. One minor point of contention emerged about 3/4 way through this bottle: I felt that it had begun to smell of low-level cork taint, but Jean (who claims to be as sensitive as me to TCA) vehemently denied that. Who knows? I bought 6 bottles of the 1970 Ducru shortly after it was released and still have 3. It has held up much better than many of the 70s. It has been a while since I opened a bottle, but the last time it was holding very well and I thought that there was no hurry to drink the remaining bottles. I still have one bottle of the 61 Ducru. I would guess it is still holding well. The 61 is considerably more complex and rich than the 70. The 62 was very good and was often overlooked since many people were buying 59s and 61s instead. At one time you could get the 62 at a very reasonable price compared to the 61, and the 62 was not that far behind the 61 in quality. |