![]() |
|
Welcome to FoodBanter.com forums which provide access to the finest food and drink related newsgroups. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most newsgroup discussions and access our other FREE features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics to the food related newsgroups, communicate privately with other FoodBanter.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload your own photos and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact support. |
|
|||||||
| Wine (alt.food.wine) Devoted to the discussion of wine and wine-related topics. A place to read and comment about wines, wine and food matching, storage systems, wine paraphernalia, etc. In general, any topic related to wine is valid fodder for the group. |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
So I got back home from city, fed the hound, and decided to feed
myself. A ribeye, some grilled potatoes (I parbaked in microwave, then tossed with oil and parsley), salad. Wines was the 2005 Ste. Colombe (Cotes de Castillon). I had really thought this a value at $9 for the '99 and $10 for the '00, but hadn't seen in more recent vintages. So when I saw the '05 for $11, a few bottles were added to a Tondonia order to get me to free delivery level. With the steak, a very pleasing wine for the level. Red berry and plum fruit, a hint of fresh herbs and tobacco, just a hint of vanillin oak on finish. Lighter Bordeaux but quite decent concentration for the level. Tannins are lighter and easier than most '05s I've had. A very pleasant claret for the money. B+/B Grade disclaimer: I'm a very easy grader, basically A is an excellent wine, B a good wine, C mediocre. Anything below C means I wouldn't drink at a party where it was only choice. Furthermore, I offer no promises of objectivity, accuracy, and certainly not of consistency. * |