![]() |
|
Welcome to FoodBanter.com forums which provide access to the finest food and drink related newsgroups. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most newsgroup discussions and access our other FREE features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics to the food related newsgroups, communicate privately with other FoodBanter.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload your own photos and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact support. |
|
|||||||
| Wine (alt.food.wine) Devoted to the discussion of wine and wine-related topics. A place to read and comment about wines, wine and food matching, storage systems, wine paraphernalia, etc. In general, any topic related to wine is valid fodder for the group. |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
With a grilled pork tenderloin, the 2006 Honig Sauvignon Blanc (Napa)
from 375. No apparent wood, good ripeness, just a hint of grass. Identifiable as Sauvignon Blanc, but more to the tropical end of fruit spectrum. OK acidity, decent value. B/B- The 2005 Bitouzet-Prieur Bourgogne is pretty hard and uncharming the first night. I'm not a happy camper. But on night 2 the tannins have receded, some nice sweet black cherry fruit has taken the lead role, with earth and spice as supporting actors. This is a basic Bourgogne that could use some time. I would have given it a C on night one, but ends up B+/B. What more needs to be said about the 2006 Edmunds St. John "Bone Jolly" Gamay Noir Rose? Just lovely, quite structured for a pink, stands up well to some herbed salmon on grill. Cherries and strawberries, flowers. Fun and satisfying wine. B+ Grade disclaimer: I'm a very easy grader, basically A is an excellent wine, B a good wine, C mediocre. Anything below C means I wouldn't drink at a party where it was only choice. Furthermore, I offer no promises of objectivity, accuracy, and certainly not of consistency. * |