![]() |
|
Welcome to FoodBanter.com forums which provide access to the finest food and drink related newsgroups. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most newsgroup discussions and access our other FREE features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics to the food related newsgroups, communicate privately with other FoodBanter.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload your own photos and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact support. |
|
|||||||
| Wine (alt.food.wine) Devoted to the discussion of wine and wine-related topics. A place to read and comment about wines, wine and food matching, storage systems, wine paraphernalia, etc. In general, any topic related to wine is valid fodder for the group. |
|
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
On May 4, 9:36Â*am, DaleW wrote:
On Apr 14, 11:47Â*am, DaleW wrote: On Apr 14, 8:02�am, gerald wrote: no, i do not, as the conversation was the better part of 10 years ago, and since i don't drink the stuff(i have thought it overpriced) i forgot most of the conversation. i do recall that my interpetation of the conversation was that gdlt was made by a different wine maker at a different site and using highly selected grapes. � is gdlt estate bottled? On Sun, 13 Apr 2008 06:28:45 -0700 (PDT), DaleW wrote: Do you have a source for the idea the GdlT was not in the infected cellar? Because the reports I read at the time said thatBVhad found contamination in the cellar where the GdlT, Tapestry, Clone 6 etc were produced. The wines that weren't effected were the low level reds and the whites.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Gerald, The GdlT is an estate wine, selected grapes from their Rutherford vineyards,. Definitely supposed to be produced at same facility as the Tapestry, etc. The low -level reds (Signet) I think are mostly non- Napa and may be produced elsewhere. Bill, since the admitted vintages with problems are '97-'00 (not sure re '01), my guess is that the level of contamination grew with each year, so '97 likely to be least affected. Maybe Mark could correct me, but I think that in most cases the issue is chlorine based cleaners on wood in a humid enviroment. It would make sense to me that initial levels would be low, and the latter years more heavily affected. I also think it was one of the rooms used, so you might have gotten a case that didn't pass through that room, I'd still pass on the 2000 at close to $40 (and if anyone wants the '98 at the $34 I paid I'll happily sell or trade!). ![]() Billl- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - So I opened the '98BVGdL last night. Definitelycorked. I've written winery, we shall see.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - (posted this on another thread, but wanted BV's response on record here, too) Credit where credit is due: talked to David Chu from Diageo, he assured me they stand by every bottle, and sent me a '04 BV GdL as a replacement- and a bottle of Tapestry (I did promise to let them know how the '60 has held up when I try in 2 years). Excellent response! |
|
|||
|
Did you have to return the bottle to them?
How did that work? "DaleW" wrote in message ... On May 4, 9:36 am, DaleW wrote: On Apr 14, 11:47 am, DaleW wrote: On Apr 14, 8:02?am, gerald wrote: no, i do not, as the conversation was the better part of 10 years ago, and since i don't drink the stuff(i have thought it overpriced) i forgot most of the conversation. i do recall that my interpetation of the conversation was that gdlt was made by a different wine maker at a different site and using highly selected grapes. ? is gdlt estate bottled? On Sun, 13 Apr 2008 06:28:45 -0700 (PDT), DaleW wrote: Do you have a source for the idea the GdlT was not in the infected cellar? Because the reports I read at the time said thatBVhad found contamination in the cellar where the GdlT, Tapestry, Clone 6 etc were produced. The wines that weren't effected were the low level reds and the whites.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Gerald, The GdlT is an estate wine, selected grapes from their Rutherford vineyards,. Definitely supposed to be produced at same facility as the Tapestry, etc. The low -level reds (Signet) I think are mostly non- Napa and may be produced elsewhere. Bill, since the admitted vintages with problems are '97-'00 (not sure re '01), my guess is that the level of contamination grew with each year, so '97 likely to be least affected. Maybe Mark could correct me, but I think that in most cases the issue is chlorine based cleaners on wood in a humid enviroment. It would make sense to me that initial levels would be low, and the latter years more heavily affected. I also think it was one of the rooms used, so you might have gotten a case that didn't pass through that room, I'd still pass on the 2000 at close to $40 (and if anyone wants the '98 at the $34 I paid I'll happily sell or trade!). ![]() Billl- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - So I opened the '98BVGdL last night. Definitelycorked. I've written winery, we shall see.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - (posted this on another thread, but wanted BV's response on record here, too) Credit where credit is due: talked to David Chu from Diageo, he assured me they stand by every bottle, and sent me a '04 BV GdL as a replacement- and a bottle of Tapestry (I did promise to let them know how the '60 has held up when I try in 2 years). Excellent response! |