![]() |
|
Welcome to FoodBanter.com forums which provide access to the finest food and drink related newsgroups. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most newsgroup discussions and access our other FREE features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics to the food related newsgroups, communicate privately with other FoodBanter.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload your own photos and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact support. |
|
|||||||
| Wine (alt.food.wine) Devoted to the discussion of wine and wine-related topics. A place to read and comment about wines, wine and food matching, storage systems, wine paraphernalia, etc. In general, any topic related to wine is valid fodder for the group. |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
I am pondering an offer to subscribe for a year to ONLINE Wine
Spectator @ $25. Wine Advocate is $100. Is there 'that' much difference between the two website offerings. Does anyone have a decided preference for people on a limited wine budget (not Charles Shaw -- hehe). Dee Dee |
|
|||
|
Dee Dee,
I don't have any experience with Wine Advocate but I did subscribe to Wine Spectator on-line for a couple of years. I used extensively their wine rating feature to check out wines and keep an on-line record of my wine collection. I used to a lesser extent the forums, vintage chart information and articles. The cost was initially $19 since I also subscribed to the magazine and at this price I thought it was a bargain. What will happen though is that in the second year the price automatically jumps to $49 for the subscription. (Still less than the $100 WA is asking.) I noticed this when I first signed up said I didn't want the "automatic" renewal feature. I understood that I didn't (have this) and then a year later saw the billing on my credit card. I'm now two months into trying to get the charges removed. Enjoy. "Dee Dee" wrote in message ups.com... I am pondering an offer to subscribe for a year to ONLINE Wine Spectator @ $25. Wine Advocate is $100. Is there 'that' much difference between the two website offerings. Does anyone have a decided preference for people on a limited wine budget (not Charles Shaw -- hehe). Dee Dee |
|
|||
|
On Jul 4, 9:40 am, "JB" wrote:
Dee Dee, I don't have any experience with Wine Advocate but I did subscribe to Wine Spectator on-line for a couple of years. I used extensively their wine rating feature to check out wines and keep an on-line record of my wine collection. I used to a lesser extent the forums, vintage chart information and articles. The cost was initially $19 since I also subscribed to the magazine and at this price I thought it was a bargain. What will happen though is that in the second year the price automatically jumps to $49 for the subscription. (Still less than the $100 WA is asking.) I noticed this when I first signed up said I didn't want the "automatic" renewal feature. I understood that I didn't (have this) and then a year later saw the billing on my credit card. I'm now two months into trying to get the charges removed. Enjoy. "Dee Dee" wrote in message ups.com... I am pondering an offer to subscribe for a year to ONLINE Wine Spectator @ $25. Wine Advocate is $100. Is there 'that' much difference between the two website offerings. Does anyone have a decided preference for people on a limited wine budget (not Charles Shaw -- hehe). Dee Dee- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Thanks for taking the time to write of your experience. Geez, I can't stand this type of credit card billing; I'm glad you mentioned this; because this is too tiresome for me to waste my time on. Dee Dee |
|
|||
|
"Dee Dee" wrote in message ups.com... I am pondering an offer to subscribe for a year to ONLINE Wine Spectator @ $25. Wine Advocate is $100. Is there 'that' much difference between the two website offerings. Does anyone have a decided preference for people on a limited wine budget (not Charles Shaw -- hehe). Dee Dee You should take a look at the Wine Enthusiast websites, www.wineenthusiast.com and www.winemag.com The latter is the wine enthusiast with their ratings, which I have never found significantly different from Spectator, except that both of these websites are FREE. I have also subscribed to Spectator on-line for a while and have had no problems with their billing. pavane |
|
|||
|
If your tastes and/or pocketbook run more to lower priced wines, then
erobertparker.com is probably not for you. At $100, it's value lies in it's database of ratings and tasting notes when searching for wines. There are indeed some really low priced wines in there - but most are $30 and way up. I like it because each year I use it to help me find high QPR Bordeaux for my cellar. The $100 is well spent. As for Spectator - I still have a problem with their ratings. Too often I suspect influence based on commercial interest; probably just paranoia, but it bothers me nevertheless. You might find that wine forums such as this may be your better bet - no $, and lots of good info! In article . com DeeDee wrote: I am pondering an offer to subscribe for a year to ONLINE WineSpectator @ $25. Wine Advocate is $100. Is there 'that' much difference between the two website offerings. Does anyone have a decided preference for people on a limited winebudget (not Charles Shaw -- hehe). Dee Dee -- I'm using an evaluation license of nemo since 39 days. You should really try it! http://www.malcom-mac.com/nemo |
|
|||
|
On Jul 4, 9:21 am, Dee Dee wrote:
I am pondering an offer to subscribe for a year to ONLINE Wine Spectator @ $25. Wine Advocate is $100. Is there 'that' much difference between the two website offerings. Does anyone have a decided preference for people on a limited wine budget (not Charles Shaw -- hehe). Dee Dee Neither, of course. What a waste of time and money. |