![]() |
|
Welcome to FoodBanter.com forums which provide access to the finest food and drink related newsgroups. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most newsgroup discussions and access our other FREE features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics to the food related newsgroups, communicate privately with other FoodBanter.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload your own photos and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact support. |
|
|||||||
| Wine (alt.food.wine) Devoted to the discussion of wine and wine-related topics. A place to read and comment about wines, wine and food matching, storage systems, wine paraphernalia, etc. In general, any topic related to wine is valid fodder for the group. |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
This was a pretty good $10 selection. Parker rates the bottle at 89
and it has a pretty good pedigree hovering mostly in the 88-91 range. AND it actually tasted good!! It's probably the first Italian wine I've tried so far. I think it makes a good "no special occasion" wine. |
|
|||
|
Gary, I have tried this wine from a previous vintage and found far to much
bottle variation. One bottle GREAT and the other fair to bad. Don't know why its like that. I did find that Falesco Merlot Umbia was a good every day drinker but a little more expensive. $5.00 more about I think. "Gary Childress" wrote in message oups.com... This was a pretty good $10 selection. Parker rates the bottle at 89 and it has a pretty good pedigree hovering mostly in the 88-91 range. AND it actually tasted good!! It's probably the first Italian wine I've tried so far. I think it makes a good "no special occasion" wine. |
|
|||
|
On May 1, 10:02 pm, "Richard Neidich" wrote:
Gary, I have tried this wine from a previous vintage and found far to much bottle variation. One bottle GREAT and the other fair to bad. Don't know why its like that. I did find that Falesco Merlot Umbia was a good every day drinker but a little more expensive. $5.00 more about I think. Maybe this just happened to be a good bottle then. Oh well, thought I had a real winner on my hands for $10. But if it isn't consistent.... :-( |
|
|||
|
Keep trying it. Formulate for yourself. I was only surprised when bottles
from the same case were that different. None appeared corked. If you have better success that would be great. For a while I drank this regularly as the house wine of sorts for every day. it was like $6-7 a few years ago...like about vintage1997 "Gary Childress" wrote in message ups.com... On May 1, 10:02 pm, "Richard Neidich" wrote: Gary, I have tried this wine from a previous vintage and found far to much bottle variation. One bottle GREAT and the other fair to bad. Don't know why its like that. I did find that Falesco Merlot Umbia was a good every day drinker but a little more expensive. $5.00 more about I think. Maybe this just happened to be a good bottle then. Oh well, thought I had a real winner on my hands for $10. But if it isn't consistent.... :-( |
|
|||
|
On May 1, 10:14 pm, "Richard Neidich" wrote:
Keep trying it. Formulate for yourself. I was only surprised when bottles from the same case were that different. None appeared corked. What do you mean by "corked"? Do you mean somehow tainted from the cork? |
|
|||
|
yes, Tainted is what I meant. They did not appear to be but then I am no
expert on that aspect. "Gary Childress" wrote in message ps.com... On May 1, 10:14 pm, "Richard Neidich" wrote: Keep trying it. Formulate for yourself. I was only surprised when bottles from the same case were that different. None appeared corked. What do you mean by "corked"? Do you mean somehow tainted from the cork? |