A Food and drink forum. FoodBanter.com

Welcome to FoodBanter.com forums which provide access to the finest food and drink related newsgroups.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most newsgroup discussions and access our other FREE features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics to the food related newsgroups, communicate privately with other FoodBanter.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload your own photos and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact support.

Go Back   Home » FoodBanter.com forum » Drinking » Wine
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Wine (alt.food.wine) Devoted to the discussion of wine and wine-related topics. A place to read and comment about wines, wine and food matching, storage systems, wine paraphernalia, etc. In general, any topic related to wine is valid fodder for the group.

Three older wines



 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 20-09-2006, 02:01 AM posted to alt.food.wine
Ken Blake
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 415
Default Three older wines

Because I no longer have good facilities to store wines for aging, these
days I pretty much buy wine only for current drinking. But I keep finding
older bottles that I had forgotten I had. In the last couple of days, I
opened three of them.

Last night, with grilled pork chops, we had the 1979 Pichon Lalande. Most of
the fruit was faded, but at least it wasn't oxidized. A pale reminder of
what it once was, but at least it was still drinkable.

Not so with the 1969 Vallana Spanna I opened tonight with grilled steak. The
bottle was heavily ullaged, with the level not quite reaching the neck. On
opening, it was brown and maderized, tasting like sherry.

I poured it down the drain and opened the 1978 Duckhorn Three Palms Merlot.
Some seepage showing on the capsule frightened me, but the wine was in
surprisingly good shape. Lots of fruit and complexity left, with perhaps
just a touch of oxidation. Clearly the best of the three.

I didn't succeed on extracting the cork from any of these. With each,
attempts to pull it resulted in pushing it down the bottle, so I pushed it
all the way in, then decanted it through a tea strainer.

None of these has been stored in the best of conditions over the last
several years, so I was pleased to find two out of three still drinkable.

--
Ken Blake
Please reply to the newsgroup


  #2 (permalink)  
Old 20-09-2006, 02:38 AM posted to alt.food.wine
DaleW
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,183
Default Three older wines

Too bad about the Pichon Lalande, it has a good rep, and I think '79 is
an underated vintage.
I am a huge fan of the Vallana Spannas of the 50s and early 60s. Wonder
if old man was still around for '69?
But a winner from a 28 yr old Cal Merlot-even a top cuvee- is still a
triumph!


Ken Blake wrote:
Because I no longer have good facilities to store wines for aging, these
days I pretty much buy wine only for current drinking. But I keep finding
older bottles that I had forgotten I had. In the last couple of days, I
opened three of them.

Last night, with grilled pork chops, we had the 1979 Pichon Lalande. Most of
the fruit was faded, but at least it wasn't oxidized. A pale reminder of
what it once was, but at least it was still drinkable.

Not so with the 1969 Vallana Spanna I opened tonight with grilled steak. The
bottle was heavily ullaged, with the level not quite reaching the neck. On
opening, it was brown and maderized, tasting like sherry.

I poured it down the drain and opened the 1978 Duckhorn Three Palms Merlot.
Some seepage showing on the capsule frightened me, but the wine was in
surprisingly good shape. Lots of fruit and complexity left, with perhaps
just a touch of oxidation. Clearly the best of the three.

I didn't succeed on extracting the cork from any of these. With each,
attempts to pull it resulted in pushing it down the bottle, so I pushed it
all the way in, then decanted it through a tea strainer.

None of these has been stored in the best of conditions over the last
several years, so I was pleased to find two out of three still drinkable.

--
Ken Blake
Please reply to the newsgroup


  #3 (permalink)  
Old 20-09-2006, 01:39 PM posted to alt.food.wine
Lawrence Leichtman[_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 272
Default Three older wines

In article . com,
"DaleW" wrote:

Too bad about the Pichon Lalande, it has a good rep, and I think '79 is
an underated vintage.
I am a huge fan of the Vallana Spannas of the 50s and early 60s. Wonder
if old man was still around for '69?
But a winner from a 28 yr old Cal Merlot-even a top cuvee- is still a
triumph!


Ken Blake wrote:
Because I no longer have good facilities to store wines for aging, these
days I pretty much buy wine only for current drinking. But I keep finding
older bottles that I had forgotten I had. In the last couple of days, I
opened three of them.

Last night, with grilled pork chops, we had the 1979 Pichon Lalande. Most of
the fruit was faded, but at least it wasn't oxidized. A pale reminder of
what it once was, but at least it was still drinkable.

Not so with the 1969 Vallana Spanna I opened tonight with grilled steak. The
bottle was heavily ullaged, with the level not quite reaching the neck. On
opening, it was brown and maderized, tasting like sherry.

I poured it down the drain and opened the 1978 Duckhorn Three Palms Merlot.
Some seepage showing on the capsule frightened me, but the wine was in
surprisingly good shape. Lots of fruit and complexity left, with perhaps
just a touch of oxidation. Clearly the best of the three.

I didn't succeed on extracting the cork from any of these. With each,
attempts to pull it resulted in pushing it down the bottle, so I pushed it
all the way in, then decanted it through a tea strainer.

None of these has been stored in the best of conditions over the last
several years, so I was pleased to find two out of three still drinkable.

--
Ken Blake
Please reply to the newsgroup


I still have two bottles in storage. I should probably pull them and
drink them.
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 20-09-2006, 02:02 PM posted to alt.food.wine
Ken Blake
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 415
Default Three older wines

DaleW wrote:

Too bad about the Pichon Lalande, it has a good rep, and I think '79
is an underated vintage.
I am a huge fan of the Vallana Spannas of the 50s and early 60s.
Wonder if old man was still around for '69?



I think so, but I don't know for sure.


But a winner from a 28 yr old Cal Merlot-even a top cuvee- is still a
triumph!



Especially considering that my storage conditions are far from ideal!

--
Ken Blake
Please reply to the newsgroup




Ken Blake wrote:
Because I no longer have good facilities to store wines for aging,
these days I pretty much buy wine only for current drinking. But I
keep finding older bottles that I had forgotten I had. In the last
couple of days, I opened three of them.

Last night, with grilled pork chops, we had the 1979 Pichon Lalande.
Most of the fruit was faded, but at least it wasn't oxidized. A pale
reminder of what it once was, but at least it was still drinkable.

Not so with the 1969 Vallana Spanna I opened tonight with grilled
steak. The bottle was heavily ullaged, with the level not quite
reaching the neck. On opening, it was brown and maderized, tasting
like sherry.

I poured it down the drain and opened the 1978 Duckhorn Three Palms
Merlot. Some seepage showing on the capsule frightened me, but the
wine was in surprisingly good shape. Lots of fruit and complexity
left, with perhaps just a touch of oxidation. Clearly the best of
the three.

I didn't succeed on extracting the cork from any of these. With each,
attempts to pull it resulted in pushing it down the bottle, so I
pushed it all the way in, then decanted it through a tea strainer.

None of these has been stored in the best of conditions over the last
several years, so I was pleased to find two out of three still
drinkable.

--
Ken Blake
Please reply to the newsgroup



 




Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Great Valued California Wines? Recommendations? $10-$20 & $20-$30 Price Ranges? dcostantiello@gmail.com Wine 4 17-06-2006 03:00 AM
TN: TTG#6 -- 4x Older Claret, 3x Burgs, 1x Champagne Jim Wine 1 10-04-2006 10:15 PM
LAT:L Who's killing the great wines of France? Tam Wine 10 08-03-2005 08:24 PM
Insanity of the wine industry Vincent Vega Wine 333 27-04-2004 07:58 PM
Another article about acidity jcoulter Wine 16 10-04-2004 05:53 PM

fitness forum |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:59 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC6
Copyright ©2004-2008 FoodBanter.com, part of the NewsgroupBanter project.
The comments are property of their posters.
Compare - Earth4Energy - Debt Management - Free Online Games - Credit Cards